Mar-a-Lago Raided by FBI
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Well the chart of one state shows the results of a 10x fat finger, of which even Reuters admits. If you remove that fat finger, let's say, by recounting the votes, then Trump should win that state!
Are you saying they re-included the 10x fat finger in subsequent recounts?
I'll say it again then: Reuters (and maybe two other sources according to gbw) does not question the authenticity of the charts. It merely says one of the charts is technically wrong because of the fat finger.
So ok, if you remove the fat finger error, we are left with an authentic chart which describes a Trump victory for that state.
The other authentic chart, according to Reuters, is accurate, despite a ton of absentee ballots all coming in late, all registered at the same time, and 95% in favor of Biden.
Do you wish to reconsider the definition of stupid and psychotic now?
You haven't explained how, if you remove the 10x fat finger in the one state, Biden could still win that state.
And you have not offered a plausible explain how absentee ballots can all come in late, be all registered as one lot (at the same time) and be 95% for Biden (when all prior results show maybe 40% Biden consistently all day).
A fraud is only final when it is accepted.
No, you are demonstrating it quite well. It's your blindspot and it appears you will defend it against all rational discussion. You are attached to your pov and behaving like a broken record.
I've described the problems with your chart yet you do not take in new information.
Bonhoeffer‘s Theory of Stupidity explains current Populism from a enlightening perspective
The only question that remains is how many of the five do you embody?
I suffer from #1, 2 & 4 from time to time.
I admit I haven't read your entire thesis which apparently questions the authenticity of the charts, one of which seems to have come from ABC News.
I'm just saying, again, Reuters (and two other sources according to gwb) does not question the authenticity of the charts like you do!
Just read what I wrote, otherwise, there is no chance of our conversation having a benefit for either of us. In it, you would see that there was a time where I was personally in the chain of custody for providing data to an entity such as ABC news.
A fundamental tenet of critical thinking is source verification.
Justice Department expected to file redacted Mar-a-Lago affidavit Thursday
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jus...e-heavily-redacted-mar-lago/story?id=88801729
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jus...e-heavily-redacted-mar-lago/story?id=88801729