Mar-a-Lago Raided by FBI

Sprout said:
If what you assert is true, McConnell would have not won re-election, nor any republican. How convenient that it's stolen elections when Democrats win.

Giuliani promoted the Big Lie and he's about to be indicted for it.

Look at the list of folks who wanted presidential pardons for their role in the insurrection.

DT is at the center of a criminal enterprise. It is coming to light and regardless of your beliefs about it, the wheels of justice are turning.
More...

We don't know how many elections are being stolen. And I don't know that the only stolen elections are going to democrats. For all we know, elections go to those willing to pay Dominion voting machines the most money, regardless of party. It takes money to steal an election. It may also require the demonization of the candidate it will be stolen from (they demonized Trump for for years). Demonization serves to get help from people you can't always pay, like judges. Because it takes money and work, we are not going to see a complete sweep for either party. But it looks like this fall we will see a big red wave...unless there are more thefts.
 
Good1 said:
We don't know how many elections are being stolen. And I don't know that the only stolen elections are going to democrats. For all we know, elections go to those willing to pay Dominion voting machines the most money, regardless of party. It takes money to steal an election. It may also require the demonization of the candidate it will be stolen from. You may need help from people you can't always pay, like judges.
More...

Dominion is about to get their day in court.

As is evident in your line of thinking, DT and supporters have poisoned our democracy with their lies.
 
Sprout said:
Dominion is about to get their day in court.

As is evident in your line of thinking, DT and supporters have poisoned our democracy with their lies.
More...
Only the main media can do that (poison a democracy). And it has.
 
Last edited:
Good1 said:
I'm not seeing where Bill Barr dismissed the charts I've found and produced here. I see he doesn't cite any specifics, and told Trump as early as Nov. 23 he thought there were no specifics. That's way too early to have any information investigated in the field and report back. It looks like prejudice.


These charts are specific, and match my own experience of monitoring the election that night.

So I'm going to have to call bullshit on Barr. He gave you the reason he didn't find any evidence: he didn't want to be a part of a precedence in case Biden was actually the winner.

So, he assumed elections were bulletproof, and so, he did not have anyone investigate. He doesn't cite any specific investigation, considered, and dismissed.

What he did do is send out a letter to offices saying if you hear anything, to let him know. He didn't, so far as I know, order an investigation into anything he heard. Possibly he didn't hear anything. And possibly none of the offices felt obligated to tell him anything they may have heard, even if they heard it. The FBI, after all, IS politicized.

The way Trump put it, Barr did not look. Clearly Barr never saw the charts I've shown. If he saw them and didn't order an investigation then I call more than just bullshit on Barr. In best case scenario he is an old man who can't think like a criminal, and so, can't imagine how an election could even be stolen. Call him what you will, "Trump DOJ", just don't call him late for dinner.

Lincoln had McClellan. Trump had Barr.

Part of the confusion is that since the Obama-Holder dynamic duo, the DOJ is supposed to be the president's wingman. Barr wanted his legacy to be Not Trump's Wingman.
More...

So you looked but Barr whose job depended on Trump winning the election didn't, these are the kind of jumping to conclusions crap that Trump cult is known for.
 
exGOPer said:
So you looked but Barr whose job depended on Trump winning the election didn't, these are the kind of jumping to conclusions crap that Trump cult is known for.
More...
Right. He sent a letter out saying basically, 'if you see anything, say something'. Nobody said anything. There's a chance Barr never even saw the charts ive produced. Was probably fast asleep when the theft happened. Too old to care about a second term. Not like he needed the money. In other interviews he tells why he joined the admin in the first place, and Durham is the result of that. That is Barr's legacy. It takes a long time to find out pretty much anything. Look how long it took Mooooler to find out Trump was not in cahoots with Russia. It's taking Durham a long time to figure a few things out too. No way the election theft was going to be proved in two days, or, in two months. There just isn't enough time for this kind of crime. This would be understood by the criminals themselves. It is a weakness in the form of this democracy, or this republic, whichever it is. The opportunity to steal was increased by some of the measures taken around covid. Rectifying it comes down to political will. If the thieves take all majorities, then political will is equal to almost zero, except for judges, to do anything in a timely manner. But judges are political creatures too. If the will is not there, then it is up to investigators, or even one single investigator, to do something. But i don't think Durham will reveal what he has until there is political will to receive it.
 
El OchoCinco said:
2016 was stolen because trump won....

see....anyone can make up bullshit and claim the evidence exists but investigators missed it..
More...

Just as important, anyone can say bullshit on social media even at a trading forum in hopes that they'll get verification from others that it's true...its a cult mentality.

I use to think people did that online because they are just ignorant but I'm now coming to the conclusion it's more psychiatric.

wrbtrader
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top