Manafort jury tampering by media

In a clear move to try and intimidate the jurors CNN requested the names of all the jurors. Thankfully the judge denied the request, but the media is trying to send a message. Find him guilty or we'll make your live a living hell.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/17...uest-dox-jurors-manafort-trial/#disqus_thread

They want to find the dirt on the jury that's holding out and how they got paid out. The only jury tampering that's been happening is the master cheetoh inserting his opinion publicly and chastising the prosecution as corrupt.
 
In a clear move to try and intimidate the jurors CNN requested the names of all the jurors. Thankfully the judge denied the request, but the media is trying to send a message. Find him guilty or we'll make your live a living hell.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/17...uest-dox-jurors-manafort-trial/#disqus_thread

You really are an idiot.

The motion — filed on behalf of CNN, Washington Post, BuzzFeed, POLITICO, New York Times, NBC Universal, and the Associated Press

Now hearing that the judge had been threatened, this motion could have been a way to flush that out in public
 
Last edited:
They want to find the dirt on the jury that's holding out and how they got paid out. The only jury tampering that's been happening is the master cheetoh inserting his opinion publicly and chastising the prosecution as corrupt.
No doubt you have evidence of that. The media has no business knowing who these jurors are during the trial, and frankly in this political climate they have no business near the courtroom. This is the leftist goon squad trying to send a message. Hey, I have idea. Lets make public all the names and addresses of every CNN employee, thier kids names, where they go to school, the works. The public has a right to know who is doing the "investigating". Certainly you're okay with that.
 
So they're all colluding to bully the jury. Thanks for pointing that out.

As above, sorry about the slow edit.

Now hearing that the judge had been threatened, this motion could have been a way to flush that out in public.

They clearly state that a valid reason for denying the motion would be if there had been threats made.

Judge being protected by federal marshals in a case marked by the main defendant having being already accused of jury tempering is news.
 
No doubt you have evidence of that. The media has no business knowing who these jurors are during the trial, and frankly in this political climate they have no business near the courtroom. This is the leftist goon squad trying to send a message. Hey, I have idea. Lets make public all the names and addresses of every CNN employee, thier kids names, where they go to school, the works. The public has a right to know who is doing the "investigating". Certainly you're okay with that.

The president has no business influencing the jurors in an unsequestered trial, but here we are. Also, no doubt you have evidence the media is targeting jurors to send a "message"?
 
The media wants the names of the jurors so they can dig through their social media accounts. They know if they can find a few FB posts or tweets supporting Trump, they can make a huge story out of it if he's acquitted. That's just how things work now.
 
Right now the judge says he was threatened & is protected by marshals, when and by who we don't know.

You can be 99% certain it was by some looney on the pro-Trump side who ran out of gas trying to get to Comet Pizza.

The senior teams of seven of the largest news outlets conspire to intimidate a jury?... yeah.

They may be interested for rummaging around reasons but I suspect it was to reveal something else.
 
The media wants the names of the jurors so they can dig through their social media accounts. They know if they can find a few FB posts or tweets supporting Trump, they can make a huge story out of it if he's acquitted. That's just how things work now.
Right now the judge says he was threatened & is protected by marshals, when and by who we don't know.

You can be 99% certain it was by some looney on the pro-Trump side who ran out of gas trying to get to Comet Pizza.

The senior teams of seven of the largest news outlets conspire to intimidate a jury?... yeah.

They may be interested for rummaging around reasons but I suspect it was to reveal something else.


Both these posts are correct. The public has no business knowing who the jurors are at this point, but the media has no obligation to no start looking, even if there are crazies on both sides. I have no doubt any competent defense lawyer would've tried to get as close to 50% Trumpers on that jury, even if the trial is about financial crimes. Whether they can detach themselves from der Fuhrer is entirely possible, but I remain the ever pessimist when it comes to Trumpklins.
 
Back
Top