Manafort Jury Scared or Rabid Democrats

Speaking of desperation. I was just reading this.

View attachment 190057

They went back to Antwerp, Belgium.

Best not to give the fascists much room really.

So explain to me how the Democratic administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt refused to let these Jewish refugees enter the United States.

I guess rejecting refugees is acceptable to the left when a Democrat does it.
 
Last edited:
I agree, which is why the left must be politically destroyed in the United States. :)
I used to think that was also a good alternative. But Peterson believes that we do need the right and the left to keep things balanced. Not a right or left managed by the extremes of course.

Here is his explanation on this matter fyr.

 
1. Contrary to some info I have seen Mannafort did not tamper with a jury, he was said to have tampered with a witness.

2. We also know the Judge had to limit the information the Prosecutors could introduce about Mannaforts relationship to Trump. Prosecutors wanted to introduce more information. So obviously they were not too concerned about pro Trump bias on this jury.

3. The articles I read stated the protesters outside the courtroom were anti trumpers.

4. Any reasonable person knows both sides have loons.

5. 9 people in the jury pool of 65 had connections to the Justice Department or the U.S. Attorneys office. But were not kicked by the judge because they said they could be fair. Given that 40 people were already kicked based on written questions there were a lot of people connected to the govt in that pool. (read large risk of democrats who don't like Trump)
 
GWB, you think I did not know that when I posted it? You only exist in little gotchas, unlike my dearest Poindexter to has real depth. I hope so as my *Johnson is substantial rrrrr...

Did you know why they were not allowed to land in the US? Because of the immigration act of 1924, signed into law by Reublican president Coolidge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924

Anyway, there was no quota left for Germans that year so they were blocked and the law was the law.


* Johnson-Reed act.
 
People who never STFU about minutia in the constitution but want use force to disenfranchises a side of the two party system... go figger.

Of course it the centralized policy, single platform party (thanks to Newt).. that hates centralised government :)

For the last 100 years the dems have held control twice as long as the cons. This is because there are just more people who look to the future than down their polished boots.
 
Didn't you just tell us that FDR did not let them in to the Virgin Islands because he was concerned there would be German spies posing as Jews?

By the way I am aware of the debates about FDRs policies towards Jews and the fact some say he was part Jewish and therefore one of the the first self loathing Jaws, so don't come back and act like you are well informed and everyone else is a moron.

We grow weary of your narcissistic shtick.



People who never STFU about minutia in the constitution but want use force to disenfranchises a side of the two party system... go figger.

Of course it the centralized policy, single platform party (thanks to Newt).. that hates centralised government :)

For the last 100 years the dems have held control twice as long as the cons. This is because there are just more people who look to the future than down their polished boots.
 
Last edited:
What minutia is that? The first amendment, the Bill of Rights, the Right to Bear Arms, the Right to Due Process and Jury of your Peers, the 9th Amendment.

Why are you lecturing us about the Constitution? You don't live here and you are Irish.




People who never STFU about minutia in the constitution but want use force to disenfranchises a side of the two party system... go figger.

Of course it the centralized policy, single platform party (thanks to Newt).. that hates centralised government :)

For the last 100 years the dems have held control twice as long as the cons. This is because there are just more people who look to the future than down their polished boots.
 
Why are you on a trading site talking about politics :)

My mom was American, half my family is etc. I own a lot of property there and a company.

Tjustice, are you 2nd or 1st generation? I'm doing a survey.
 
Why are you here talking about American politics?
You don't vote, you don't live here.

Many of my posts are responses to leftist nonsense posted by foreign trolls on this trading site. I will tell you I have an issue with foreign leftists trying to split our country further along race lines. I find it immoral. I suspect some are even paid to be posting this hate fomenting propaganda. If a real American has a real problem that is one thing. I understand when U.S. citizens, who are minorities, make legitimate arguments about things which are still unfair. I may see things things differently but they are Americans too and I value their view. I despise foreigners with fake news, fake spin and lies dividing the country for democrats. If Republicans were paying foreigners to cause race issues I would despise that too.

You wish to educate us regarding paper trading or real trading go for it.
You post leftist anti American propaganda, I may respond.

Now run along and find another forum for your hate or use your intelligence to improve things rather than just hating on Trump and throwing ad homs around whenever you are challenged.



Why are you on a trading site talking about politics :)

My mom was American, half my family is etc. I own a lot of property there and a company.

Tjustice, are you 2nd or 1st generation? I'm doing a survey.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top