I called your attention to a nice review of the literature bearing on our current knowledge re volcanic emissions and the various conflicting estimates of the amount of magnitic emissions. The author's training clearly qualifies him to write such a review, whereas I would think him less qualified to post on the other topics on his blog. All of this information re volcanic activity was new to me.
I thought his article on the Greenhouse effect, somewhat missed the boat, so to speak. It was an interesting review of the very early history; he claims Arrhenius misunderstood Fourier. However his review is strictly from an equilibrium thermodynamic viewpoint , and this alone can''t provide an adequate understanding of the Greenhouse Effect. He did not evidence any understanding of the photophysics; and he failed to recognize that non-equilibrium thermodynamics is involved. It is the relative rates of heat production and dissipation rather than just the amounts of production and dissipation that must be taken into account.
Read my lips. ....
You are so full of shit that if you were given E-Lax you would explode.