Well to be honest, you don't need to trade well to participate in ET, you just need to not act like your balls are golden and you know shit when don't know shit.
And how do you propose that gets accomplished? There’s so much crap that is posted with their internet balls and all.Well to be honest, you don't need to trade well to participate in ET, you just need to not act like your balls are golden and you know shit when don't know shit.
And how do you propose that gets accomplished? There’s so much crap that is posted with their internet balls and all.
listen, I'm trying to be as unbiased as possible, I don't know about that smith stuff but time to time i was researching ross hook bars on various forums and on babypips there was an username who spoke about 1 2 3 formations and ross hooks and well the writing style did (imo) resemble xela. Regardless that info helped me there, and some other posts of xela about 1 2 3 formations and other stuff. Just my 2 cents , in no way im trying to defend xela or anyone here , but if I recall correctly those posts in babypips showed the same preferences of trading style as xela (and xela mentioned here that she used to trade 1 2 3 patterns in fx), aside from that user on babypips recommended the same authors as xela would. So there is some legitimacy in xelas well "internet identity".
listen, I'm trying to be as unbiased as possible, I don't know about that smith stuff but time to time i was researching ross hook bars on various forums and on babypips there was an username who spoke about 1 2 3 formations and ross hooks and well the writing style did (imo) resemble xela. Regardless that info helped me there, and some other posts of xela about 1 2 3 formations and other stuff. Just my 2 cents , in no way im trying to defend xela or anyone here , but if I recall correctly those posts in babypips showed the same preferences of trading style as xela (and xela mentioned here that she used to trade 1 2 3 patterns in fx), aside from that user on babypips recommended the same authors as xela would. So there is some legitimacy in xelas well "internet identity".
Damnation has two posts... ostensibly been here forever and never posted. Works at Goldman. Just a coincidence. You lost us at babypips. So language that resembled Xela's writing helped you? Cool story, Bro. You're 110% legit. I'd like to punch a hole in the chests of sockpuppets.
Not too hard to quote someone else's information as though you are knowledgeable. Name dropping and quoting other trader's ideas is how you make it seem like you know something to the newbies I guess. I think if you bypassed Xe-liar and just went straight to Ross info you would learn a lot more without his shit filter.

Ross hooks are just trend pullbacks, everybody has a variation.listen, I'm trying to be as unbiased as possible, I don't know about that smith stuff but time to time i was researching ross hook bars on various forums and on babypips there was an username who spoke about 1 2 3 formations and ross hooks and well the writing style did (imo) resemble xela. Regardless that info helped me there, and some other posts of xela about 1 2 3 formations and other stuff. Just my 2 cents , in no way im trying to defend xela or anyone here , but if I recall correctly those posts in babypips showed the same preferences of trading style as xela (and xela mentioned here that she used to trade 1 2 3 patterns in fx), aside from that user on babypips recommended the same authors as xela would. So there is some legitimacy in xelas well "internet identity".