Quote from Vespasian:
Of course not![]()
I do however expect to see results of some quantifiable experiences.
It seems to me that which TA tool one uses does not matter. It is mostly a mental problem.
If I assume that you want to be a discretionary trader then any TA tool will work as long as you use it to create an "accurate" mental picture of the market and act when the PA action fits or does not fit that picture.
So what ever TA toll helps you build that "accurate" market picture is the best for you.
IMO MP is a good toll to use. But try to see how a skewed distribution acts as far as VA is concerned. In a very skewed distribution the original MP VAH or VAL will not be lines where you should expect the price to rerun to the VA but exactly the opposite it will be a place where you would expect the price to run opposite of the POC. You could apply VAH and VAL and VA methods to a balanced profile and that could work OK. But you have to wait for that balance. There is tons more. I am just ranting at this point. Also I am still trying to make sense of it myself. Let's hope other traders will say more.
I would like some comments on the fact that as new data comes in the distribution changes. For example a balanced distribution will change to a skewed one. It is a paradox that we have to act on a fact that is changing. Can we assume that the distribution is stable for some period and it is OK to trade it? Or should we trade it to the point that we see that the distribution has changed and adjust accordingly?
The problem of adjusting, of being mentally flexible, of not expecting and hoping, of not freezing is the main one. Again it appears to be mental not technical.
How much can one rant? Enough for now.