But hey - that's my view. And we don't need to discuss it further.
You don't know how much I understand your view !!
That said, I'll just say a thing before closing that discussion as you express such a desire.
At a certain level of comprehension which means, at a certain level of awerness, what will be a proof for one won't be for another being at another level of coupled awareness/comprehension.
Let's say in about 2 months I begin, cause all the remaining pieces I still have to put together with those I already have are now gathered and nested all together. I begin to extract a very nice part of the full offer of the market. Not the full offer simply because it's the beginning, and of course I need to let my rubbers meet the road and practice in live w/ real money to tend to extract the full offer.
Do you believe I'd post any proof, any screenshot of my account ? I will never do that. Simply because I would owe this more than anything/one else to myself. Plus, it could only produce jealousy, it would be a provocation. A huge one. AND Do you think such proofs would make thousands of people take the move ?It would not. The work asks a lot of concentration, absence of greed, endurance, sacrifice, time, devotion, heart... I've seen many people have in front of them universal undeniable proofs that some things were real. They did not move a finger, in spite of the evidence.
What if JH had posted its results on its account(s) ? Would this necessary mean it was the result of direct application of its teached methods ? Maybe JH was a multimillionaire from birth, born where and when it was the best, and he could have spent his time inventing insane gibberish on internet, posting pics retouched on Paint of a virtual account with series of positive orders.. I could post this if you want ^^
For me, one of the two proofs I have received from JH that all this is true, is precisely the fact he never posted the proofs many asked...
Imagine a second JH talked true. All this works, is true, is doable. It's real. Do you think in this world, anyone could make that gift differently than how JH did ? In other words, filtering away people who cannot think critically, lazy and greedy people ? Making it locked in a labyrinth ? He had heart enough to pass it forward.
So I'd keep these proofs more than anything for myself. The only thing I could do next, would be pass it forward and do what
@Sprout in number 1, has been doing with me for 2 years now. The only difference would be I'd do it my way.
To finish, let me tell you a thing : it is not a matter of the proof one can receive that one would believe what one sees. It's a matter of what can one host.
When I entered into JHM, although I understood those asking for the proofs of all the proofs, I never had any other need of proof than this one :
future is always contained inside the present; it's not about predicting what's gonna happen, but all the matter is to understand that everything produces the substance of its own birth. So we, as human beings, only can anticipate what comes next, analysing in a given context the story of our present, as it unfolds in front of our eyes. [...] there is not even a millimeter of the present that was not already present inside the past. The foam of present already exists in the source of the past. All that happens now was contained in-before, the most little move of right now was already present in the past.
I'd bet money (If I had some ^^) that you think you just read a JH's text.
It isn't.
This is just what some human beings, 2000 years ago, were already saying and writting. 18 centuries later, some people retook the thread of history, produced anticipations of what world would be 50, 100, 150, 200 years later. This is what I study when I'm not studying JH. They have never been wrong so far.
If one told to another "read this book and you'll see that everything that happens nowadays was anticipated inside this book. Oh, and this book is 150 years old. Oh, and if you wanna go further and feed the comprehension, you can read those 10 000 pages more. It's the paths, all the dissection from source to foam".
Will one necessarly read and do the work ?...just imagine.
So, "when I met JH", when I saw what he was saying, I could just DD that this man was doing nothing but expressing the radical method Hegel and presocratics used, in other words, the real move of history....applied to trading.
I applied it to spanish and foosball, uncounsciously, I saw the results.
Apply it to anything and see the result.
I assume you must have a full overview of everything taught by Jack by now?
That would be very pretentious from me. Better said, I'm still studying and I have most of the pieces.
I wish you the best.
