Making JH' SCT and all his material alive
- Thread starter WchPl
- Start date
T2F repeats can occur as long as they are > T1. PP6a is when there is no wait as T2F’s are repeating.
When wait is in the sequence, then Fc is possible.
How you understand n, and n+1 offsetting and the OOE of OOE’s makes it clear or confusing.
There are a couple of things.
In the past, when someone (you know who) said he felt for me and you all should give me something in private to let me be profitable or leave me alone, you said about yourself you are a JH method rogue. It's fine for you, you annotate daily and are profitable. Who's to argue ? No one. But you can certainly admit this way of thinking have an influence on your work ethic and your determination to unlock, understand and use the system in its entirety, don't you ?
Effectively, 100% is not a requirement, by the sys being so resiliant as Sprout mentionned it, and as I'm beginning to understand by myself.
Also, I don't understand for now why three T2P's w/ equal volume would yield PP6a. AND as for "how many times have you arrived to T2F or after, I must say from LTM, around 2/3 times out of maybe 800-1000 bars. So rare, you are right. Even B-band is rare, like 2/3 bars out of 50/80 bars. Seems like along the 45+16 sessions fully logged and annotated I've done up to now, I must have, taking into a count the more I look into past logs higher is the possibility that I made mistakes and mis-IDs :
-around 50% of EEs are FS's
- around 39% are PP!s
- around 9% are A-band EEs
- less than 1% is B-band
- the rest is C-band and beyond. So less than "less than" 1%.
I must say I understand very well what you say and that there is a lot of truth in it.
As for what you say about DOM, I have to read about it yes. Starting a new thread is, nonetheless, nor a priority for me now.
At last, I understand that you do not understand the need of perfection. This is a rogue thinking and honestly, I must say this is a profitable thinking, you are in this case so once again who's to argue ? If what you do lead you to where you want, you are the one who's right.
The thing, for my case, is that it took me a while to understand there is no need to know everything about RDBMS, absolutely everything for being highly profitable each and every day. I really spent a lot of time thinking if any piece was not understood, you were fu***d up. That is not true. I understand it now. Even though one can miss an EE, FS will always be there to wash and replace one on the right side. This is so powerful. So, the need of perfection you seem to think I have, which I don't, comes from this fact : I thought until recently that I needed to know everything in an absolute and relative maneer. Again, I realized recently this is false.
With that said, concerning the 2% I don't get yet : I do not see the wrong/bad/unnecessary thing in the fact that I continue to study it by DD, building drawings etc. It does not cost anything.
BUT
And this is surely the most important thing I'll say in this post : I must say, from 1/2 weeks, I feel like effectively I understand and can use 98% of the method. And I'm wondering why I can't start trading. Let's talk concretely. There must be something missing. Let's ignore G/H/K bands for now. Ok I understand 98% of the whole, I admit and constate it. Cool (no, great in fact). But I wonder now how I have to use what I know.
Some days ago, Sprout made me download a trading plateform, this is a signal for me, and he invited me to add the tri-pane (30min and YM if I remember correctly). He said with that, I'm a click away from drilling up and down from coarse to finer detail. Unfortunately I've not received answer yet as for which data subscription to use on tradingview. I've posted a message for that, and I cannot subscribe to a billing without being sure it's the one I need. I have no money enough for that. I'm waiting for an answer, because exceptionally here, we're not in the "stimulate own DD is most important in JH journey". That's just a tool, this is not unveiling any secret, any DD result to anyone. Therefore, I'm waiting. Maybe you can tell me ? You are free.
In a nutshell, the truth is that I'm maybe ready to be profitable, even maybe highly (20/25 points a day averagely), I don't know ,and I should do that while nothing prevents me to work parallely on beyond F-band EEs. The thing is that I need to know what is missing to me, except the tri-pane that is a function available in the billing I must take. So I'm blocked for now. In addition, I don't know yet what would the YM 2min and the 30chart bring as drills, but I can't wait to discover it and do the drill in question.
Finally, I'm aware of what you say about the skeleton I have and that works 98% of time. I wish I could use it, and refine the remaining dark/unknown areas, simply because I like it. But I really wonder what prevents me to trade, I mean I don't know how to use it cause I constate if at each EE I reverse and us IF1/IF2 APA as I understand it, most of times I'm -x points a day.
Last edited:
Yes I understand T2F repeats as long as they are under T1. But I can't make the difference yet between Fc and P3F and T2F. If the second, with no wait in between, T2F arrives and is a repeat, at my LOD and comprehension, it will be also P3F and Fc. So T2F repeat will always be an EE and then PP6a can't happen. Again, that's my current sticking point.
I am currently DDing that yes, I have to review my understanding of n and n+1. But I feel I'm quite close to eradicate confusion
Finally, I am currently thinking about :
Yes I understand T2F repeats as long as they are under T1. But I can't make the difference yet between Fc and P3F and T2F. If the second, with no wait in between, T2F arrives and is a repeat, at my LOD and comprehension, it will be also P3F and Fc. So T2F repeat will always be an EE and then PP6a can't happen. Again, that's my current sticking point.
Fc is primed if wait is in the sequence of repeating T2F’s.
P3F is a trend segment that fails - no third peak to end the trend.
I am currently DDing that yes, I have to review my understanding of n and n+1. But I feel I'm quite close to eradicate confusion
Finally, I am currently thinking about :
Comments within quoted text.
46th MADA session, Hindsigh (HS) - 38EE's
Beginning to log families of EE's per session :
25 FS's / 38 EE's = 65%
8 PP!s / 40EE's = 23%
5 A-band EE's / 40EE's = 12%
Attachments
A quick calculation based on my last 27 sessions.
38 as average number of EEs per session
1 EE each 2.1 bars
74% FS's
18% PP!s
7% A-band EEs
0.2% B-Band EEs
1% C-through K-bands EE.
This clears up some things. I had already a bit DDd that a wait was needed for Fc to surge. It's logical, like everything.
As for P3F, from JH it means the trend has not come to an end so P3F cannot be an EE.
Tomorrow I'll develop more from this, and see if, finally, after the reviewing of the n and n+1 compréhension, I can end it with H and K-bands defenitively. I feel and see in my mind I probably have come to the end as for EE's.
By the way @Sprout, can you please be more explicit as for the billing on trading view so that I can subscribe to the right datas? I don't see any non pro billing. Please can you tell me which billing you refer to? Thank you very much.
Tradingview has a subscription fee and a separate data fee that is waived with a qualifying broker.
With the qualifying broker get the minimum data fee package that includes the instrument you want to trade. It’s generally between $20-30 for a package that includes the ES and YM.
You’ll have to familiarize yourself with the brokerage platform to have it match the pic posted. This is self-regulating. Learning the platform is a prerequisite and there is no better time than now.