Here is the first third of the Master Copy Matrix.
I stopped it at sequence 3. and so, cause I saw new things appeared.
First of all, and that's all the matter, in fact, I noticed that from the beginning, I arbitrary affected sentiments to the first two price bars, got the form of it, and then added the 3rd bar, to continue the drill you told me about
@Sprout . When I began the sequence 3. so by 31 case I said to myself : "well, the third bar is either gonna form a LAT form, or a kind of "long BO". Then inside the LAT form and the BO form, the trend can either FAN or ACC, and in FAN case, the close of the third bar depending on its sent, can either be under prior RTL/ between RTL and 1st bar's high/ above 1st bar high.".
From there, some cases appeared as seen on the image. And from there, surged in my mind : "but what about the sent and then the open and close of bars 1 and 2 ?".
Then I drew this :
That is an example of a continous short sentiment on a continous long form (XB). If we consider one little square on my sheet as the most little tick the bar can vary of, the we can see that bar 1 is 6 ticks in volatility, and so are the next 4. And then let's fix each bar will have 1 tick between its Open and Close.
Then if we want to see a continous short sentiment along the next bars while conserving an XB form, then the number of bars on which we'll be able to observe that is determined by...the number of ticks between bar 1's high and the low of the bar where this context will become impossible on. The bar where it becomes impossible to continue to see short sent on XBs, is the third bar after the first one. That's because there were 3 ticks in volatility between bar 1 and bar 4. After bar 3, it's impossible to see short sent and XB on the third bar, only a DOJI or then we will either have StB/OB formed by bar3+bar4. So, the repetition of XB with short sent is broken.
Why did I do that, and what does it help me for ?
->
From there, some cases appeared as seen on the image. And from there, surged in my mind : "but what about the sent and then the open and close of bars 1 and 2 ?".
It turns out that in function of, in my matrix, which sent was affected to the first two bars and where both Open/Close were affected on each bar, the third bar sees its "possible surge in form and nuances in ubication of O/C compared to prior RTL" considerably reduced or even sometimes cancelled.
So,
@Sprout , the question is : do you think, as I do a bit now, that I should begin again my matrix affecting all the sentiment permutations to not only the 3rd bar, but also to the first two ones ?
It would be then (L for long, S for short) that for any price case combo : LLL/ LLS/LSL/LSS/SSS/SSL/SLS/SLL.
I understand the matter of that drill is to establish the possible ubications of O/C of the third bar compared to the prior RTL. But once this is established, there are also nuances that can appear. And this fact, came into my perception with the "continous short sent on a continous long form".
As I was on the 31 case, I was establishing the possible forms it could have. The result is that it can either create a Lat, or a "long BO". Once this established, this following example made what I said previously as for O/C and sents of the first two bars jump at me :
That is not an exhaustive comment, but on the first case of the page (so long sent on 3rd bar with close below the two prior RTLs) we can clearly see that the whole sent of the three bars is long. And by looking a bit closer and precisely, we can see it by noticing ....that the open of bar 1 is below bar 3's close. Meanwhile, the form clearly shows a short trend. This is what led me to the "continous short sent on a continous long form".
So what came to my mind is that, the open and close of bar 1 and 2 matter as much as the third bar's.
So, to reformulate my question : am I seeing to far beyond where I am at the moment ?
To synthetize, when form says something and the sentiment contradicts it, the context will make us decide if either the form/the sent takes precedence....and this reminds me your last comments
By the way, here are the quoting I wanted to use to ubicate the infos of your last post, that I see fuzzy the most.
12:
1st case - this one's tricky since the sentiment of the bar can be in congruent with the form or non congruent with the form.
congruent with the form -> which form are you precisely talking about ? the most actual, so XR or the prior one so XB ? As I see things, logically the congruent sentiment with an XB form is Long, and the congruent sent with an XR form is short; but this is maybe where I start bad.
2nd case - It would be accelerating if we observed a surge of increasing volume.
We're in the 13 = XB/SYM case. When I said there there can be "ACC", as always from the beginning on the stuff I'm currently doing, I was talking about the form, the vector, the degree of inclination of the trendline. I don't get how volume can validate or invalidate the fact that a trendline made up by two highs/lows of 2 price bars is more or less sloped ? I may be missing what you say. Can you clarify please ?
If the sentiment XO a previously defined RTL on increasing volume then process like an OB.
Several months ago you told me "you're a bit of perfectionnist". You were right. When you sey here " if the sentiment XO a [...] RTL". Are you talking a bout one of the legs of the bar ? or the close ? I mean, the sent is, for me, the nature of the gap between O/C, so either the unique leg of the bar, or leg 2. Once again, could you clarify please with a bit more of precision as for the term ?
NB : I also noticed, beyond and in addition to the ubication of O/C of bars 1 and 2 in my master copy matrix of 3 bars in a row, that the number of legs also counts and says a LOT. It makes some "next steps" possible or not in function of how it began. As always, future precedes the present and the past.
When observing bar sentiment, then sometimes a new BM is place other times not, hence the suggestion of tracing paper/copies so that you can keep the differentiation clear and using what you've done so far as a 'master copy'
It took me a nice while to realize I had not understood what you meant here. Sometimes, I feel stupid... I get you now, and am currently building that master copy that I'll photocop.
Hope you're doing well, wish you the best Aha's in your new sphere
