Making JH' SCT and all his material alive

I stopped because of my painful head and brain, and it also corresponded to some issue I found myself to face to. Here it is, light blue squared : 12:45pm, bar 40. After a B-Band Pass so T2P has appeared, the price case is XB so the prior long trend (FF) established continues, and we measure volume : here it is : volume is above the prior one which was a non measured bar, and the prior volume element was T2P. What is a peak after T2P with price case in the same direction of the trend ? I'd say it cannot be T2F, of course. Can it be a P2 ? if yes, then this opens the door to something that is blocked for me since long. Is that rev chron ? and so we do counterclock wise arrow pointing towards the next peak found in the reversed chrono order of OOE, which would be P2 ?

In Volume Elements sheet, what is repeat and rev chron conditions for T2P? (NEXT is after P"). Wether it is P!, P2, T2P is not so clear from texts and sheets, need deduction. So nobody alive can really provide the exact original scenarios, unless someone chime in.

Also wondering about the bar before zone of issue, which looks measurable. EE.pdf page 2 might be useful if you have it.
 
Last edited:
MADA and Log on today's chart after the fact. No real time. I'm ...a bit of tired, and overwhelmed also but not in the same sense that before in the past, when I was saying it.
Before, it meant "I can't stand being at work anymore".

Now, it's rather a "I feel I came to saturation and need some sleeping and funny things for some hours or one day, te digest what I did and be able to fill the remaining holes and revisit everything to refine it and go forward". I started at 10:am this morning, worked until 4:30pm, then had a break until 7:30pm, and went back to work until now, and it's now 10pm for me.
Enough for today ;)

Have a great end of day to everyone, very best of iterative refinement to all of you ;)

View attachment 199743

View attachment 199746
View attachment 199747
View attachment 199748


Good progress.

When first starting out, taking a week to complete a day’s 5m ES is about par for the course.

Next:
1) fill in the degap column. Either by using arrows, check mark or in my case I use ‘dg’ in cursive. It’s important to get into the habit from the getgo. The column’s purpose is to remind one to always check, and if a degap is required then to mark that column.

It’ll build capacity to mentally degap.

With Tradingview I was able to create a simple script to color the bars which helps determine if the highs and lows are >,=,<.

It’s posted in the software thread.

As for the volume bars, if you hover the cursor over the bar, you’ll see in the upper left corner of the volume pane the exact number of contracts. With this one can measure exactly.


2) annotate the laterals with a parallel channel and have a light yellow translucent fill color. Extend until the BO bar of the lateral.

3) annotate the OB’s, StB, StR with the asymmetrical channel tool. I use translucent blue for the OB’s and translucent lavender for the StB, StR’s.

4) refine the labeling and ID’ing of the BM, rev; BO,T1 and a bar that can be both these FS’s as opposed to either one. Of all the FS’s you have labeled they can go into 1 of the 3 piles.

Whenever a FS or an EE occurs, the OOE resets for a new trend segment is underway.
 
Last edited:
@Sprout , is there anything that could make you say that Simpleminds is better to use than any other software ? I finally found a possibility to buy it.
If you advise to use it, which version of subscription do you find the best ? Pro version ?

I progressed from free to paid. I currently use the pro version which Is the best I’ve found
 
simplemind pro bought.png
 
I had a dream last night...


I was in a room, quite big, with windows all around, looking a bit like an office. It was a group of work.
I was sitting on a chair, around a table and working with papersheets and pencils, some people were around me working with me, working on the same I was working on.
I had, while I was working, no idea about was I was working on, neither what other people were doing. I only knew I was working on something, and so was doing the others. There was someone similar to a teacher, hard to remember now, but I guess she was a woman. She was explaining a move, how to use something, when and why. She was teaching us.

Then, I watched at the student sitting next to me, more precisely at what was on the papersheet he was using. And suddenly I saw it was the Modrian Table.
He said to me : so you labelled this, it takes you to that and now and only now you must use the modrian that will take you to the move reversal one.

I still hear in my head the words and the voices.


:wtf:o_O:rolleyes::confused::caution::caution::caution::wtf: HELL !
 
The simplemind website is simplemind.eu
I don't know if you wanted to indicate me something or so, but the screen I posted was to show I bought the pro version of Simplemind. It's ok, I have it now, all is perfect :)


Along the last 2 days, I've been working on building my EE catalog as a dynamic path, reading my printed docs and searching for my answers in order to refine the performing of the VTP and then , filling the log. I'm also trying to incorporate the content of your last message @Sprout.
That's a lot of work which is in a first temporality unpostable cause unachieved, and that's why I don't post anymore since 2-3 days.
Don't worry, it's all good, it's just that doing the EE catalog and reading for my answers from the docs is just quite long.

When I have something good done, I'll post it immediately.

With that said, expect me to post a log today.

Best wishes to all of you for today !
 
I went back a bit to some unprinted docs, so read the m on PC, and in addition to what I've already read, the following helps me to get the degapping concept :

You don't need to degap if you do the degaping mentally. But imagine how much clearer Jack's charts could be if the bars on his charts were automatically degaped. All those additional, assistance lines he has to add on price would be gone.

You degap to see the price CASES clearly and correctly. In realtime you can still see the current price on the current bar. You are only shifting the previous bar(s) up or down.

So... you have the current price on the current bar and all you want to know is: What is this bar in RELATION to the previous bar(s)? Is it an internal, translation, etc.? Does it give us permission to measure volume or not? You don't kneed to know what historically the previous bar(s) values were.

Here are some quotes from Jack:

"...to degap it, the math is to change the historical values of all prior bars and keep the forming bar using the real market values..."
--------------------------
"Degapping bar to bar is a requirement of RDBMS.

Fractals have their place. To see them correctly, degapping must be done before the observation is made.

People make decisions to enjoy a shortcut here and there. They are called "losers"."
--------------------------
"...Because your display does not degap bar to bar, you miss many internal cases...."
--------------------------
"...Bars are relative...."
---------------------------
"...YOU MUST ALWAYS DEGAP...."
---------------------------
"...Only degapped bars can be compared. So degap and then compare...."

Gonna fill 03/27/19 ES Chart using what I understand about degap, and add your additional requirements @Sprout as for Stb and internal shape colors etc. Right now.
 
Currently incorporating everything together. It's quite hard but it's doable and appreciable exercise, I just don't know if I'll be able to post my log when I wanted to. May be tonight, late, or tomorrow morning. Also I have to spend time for something else than the work today, it's rare but does happen. Nevermind, what must be done will be so.
 
I went back a bit to some unprinted docs, so read the m on PC, and in addition to what I've already read, the following helps me to get the degapping concept :



Gonna fill 03/27/19 ES Chart using what I understand about degap, and add your additional requirements @Sprout as for Stb and internal shape colors etc. Right now.


You’re doing great. As you can see from your own work, they’ll be insights and aha’s that are only accessible by doing the work itself. Even though it seems like just being given an answer would be an efficient mode of transference, in reality, discovering answers for oneself is really the most efficient. It makes the concept of ‘realizing’ experiential.

Consider using a type of pomodoro app to support focus time. There are a lot of good free ones, many that integrate into one’s browser.
 
Back
Top