Making JH' SCT and all his material alive
- Thread starter WchPl
- Start date
Sorry to hear that FOR YOU, it was a complete waste of time, no help in any way.
FS means (F)ail (S)afe. I am certain you have seen the nomenclature used many times in the past. As to which answer... if I told you that would be cheating.
You and I are oil and water. There is nothing wrong with that.
I wish you all the best for your efforts on your journey.
No problem, thaks you very much for your attempt to share and help.
I did yes, many times. Thank you !
I should have said : which "QUESTION" did you think I was gonna answer with your exercise ?
But anyway, if telling the question that you thought I would have answered with your practicing is not fair for you, and even worse if you say that this kind of help would be cheating.....
You come here saying you wanna help, give an exercise to solve a question that surged earlier, the student tells you "I don't see the helpful in that exercise, which question were you answering ?", and your answer is : sorry if it's not helpful FOR YOU, you're oil and I'm water, see you and best wishes"....
WAW........ now you can even say oil and water have thousands more common points than you and I have.
Don't waste your time
Your TL’s should match your volume annotations. (Put channels on hold). In other words focus on the FFF trend segments. RDBMS tracks trend segments. As for StB, StR it depends. They are considered internals so wait but if a FS overrides it, it is measured. With internals it is helpful ‘to squish’ the StB or StR into the bar previous.
As for your tone with Tiddlywinks, you might want to check yourself before you wreck yourself. Nobody here as any obligation to say anything.
It’s frustrating on both parts to answer the same questions repeatedly especially since you should be training yourself to get your answers from the market and previously posted material.
With all that said, the next step is that you should be building your visual catalog of all the EE’s and looking for volume sequences that are aligning. One or two sheets is enough per PP!, Aband, and B-K bands.
Just felt like chiming in a little. If you do the exercise, you would notice the order of volume events. For example, why is PP3 located where it is? Notice the description in the PP sheet. T1 between 2 P1's. PP type ending events aren't only about P1 as you suggested in the questions.
Thank you very very much
It's my current struggle
Thank you very luch for chiming in a little
but I cannot find where I suggested PP type ending event would be only about P1... nor do I understand the sens of that sentence. Can you help please ?Working on this currently
Well. That was a nice illustration of what I've been feeling since the very beginning of that journey, 5 years ago.
What happened with @tiddlywinks ? I am here, opening a Journal, saying it's for help people and being helped. Right ?
Tiddly comes here and generously provides an exercise to give an answer to a question I had made previously. Until here, great !
I do the exercise, but being unable to understand in what it was helpful and unable to get the question this exercise was gonna answer, I feel frustrated and this takes me to new questions.
Then I give thanks for the contribution, and ask in what this should have helped me, and I ask for locating the question that was to be answered by Tiddly's exercise.
What's the answer from the one who wanna help ? -> "sorry if it was a complete waste of time, we're like oil and water, and if I give you the question I talk about, that would be cheating". Am I right ? Am I seeing things how they are ? Or how I'd like them to be?
Did I say it was a complete waste of time ? Or did I ask to be helped to see what I do not in that exercise ?
That's absolutely typical. So @tiddlywinks , if I've hurt your ego and anything else, I apologize and am sad for you about this, as it was not my intention. @Sprout invited me to check myself before wrecking myself. That's what I'm doing now.
But the more I check myself on what happened, the less I feel bad.
You really appear to me as you decided unconsciouly to take me down, whatever I could have answered or said about your exercise. I did not say it was a waste of time, I gave you thanks, and asked for the helpfulness of it. You just DID NOT WANT to answer. That's the truth. If I'm wrong, feel free to demonstrate it.
With that said, let's be honest a sec. I know nobody here has any obligation to say anything. @Sprout thank you for reminding me that.
But sincerly, do you consider the attitude of @tiddlywinks was honest, willing to help and to fill empty knowledge zones ?
Example : here when you say I should be getting my answers from the market, how can't you see that you lead me, by saying what you say, to believe I should stop asking questions to human being ?
If I can get all my answers from the market, why am I talking to you ? why are you talking to me ?
A few weeks ago, @JamesRoscoe said "by time we'll help you know that you know". Do you sincerly, authentically feel the same attitude than other people ?
I am really doing my best to understand what I did bad, why you told me that I might check myself, and that would be a huge help if you described sincerly and precisely what I did wrong.
Last edited:
Thank you very very much
It's my current struggle
Thank you very luch for chiming in a little
Working on this currently
Well. That was a nice illustration of what I've been feeling since the very beginning of that journey, 5 years ago.
What happened with @tiddlywinks ? I am here, opening a Journal, saying it's for help people and being helped. Right ?
Tiddly comes here and generously provides an exercise to give an answer to a question I had made previously. Until here, great !
I do the exercise, but being unable to understand in what it was helpful and unable to get the question this exercise was gonna answer, I feel frustrated and this takes me to new questions.
Then I give thanks for the contribution, and ask in what this should have helped me, and I ask for locating the question that was to be answered by Tiddly's exercise.
What's the answer from the one who wanna help ? -> "sorry if it was a complete waste of time, we're like oil and water, and if I give you the question I talk about, that would be cheating". Am I right ? Am I seeing things how they are ? Or how I'd like them to be?
Did I say it was a complete waste of time ? Or did I ask to be helped to see what I do not in that exercise ?
That's absolutely typical. So @tiddlywinks , if I've hurt your ego and anything else, I apologize and am sad for you about this, as it was not my intention. @Sprout invited me to check myself before wrecking myself. That's what I'm doing now.
But the more I check myself on what happened, the less I feel bad.
You really appear to me as you decided unconsciouly to take me down, whatever I could have answered or said about your exercise. I did not say it was a waste of time, I gave you thanks, and asked for the helpfulness of it. You just DID NOT WANT to answer. That's the truth. If I'm wrong, feel free to demonstrate it.
With that said, let's be honest a sec. I know nobody here has any obligation to say anything. @Sprout thank you for reminding me that.
But sincerly, do you consider the attitude of @tiddlywinks was honest, willing to help and to fill empty knowledge zones ?
Example : here when you say I should be getting my answers from the market, how can't you see that you lead me, by saying what you say, to believe I should stop asking questions to human being ?
If I can get all my answers from the market, why am I talking to you ? why are you talking to me ?
A few weeks ago, @JamesRoscoe said "by time we'll help you know that you know". Do you sincerly, authentically feel the same attitude than other people ?
I am really doing my best to understand what I did bad, why you told me that I might check myself, and that would be a huge help if you described sincerly and precisely what I did wrong.
It would be more advantageous to you to pivot and focus on what you are doing right.
By amplifying the ‘rightness’, that will attract more of the same. You’ve considered the suggestion, got clear with yourself about it, made amends, and are ready to move on.
So with that said, post a sheet that has a visual catalog of the PP!’s. Just like you’ve done the drill of adding a third bar to the ten price cases, you will notice that the PP!’s are a small subset of the work that you have already done by accomplishing that drill.
As for the containers in the last chart, you are annotating the larger fractal channel and not the traverses within. RDBMS tracks the traverses within the channels you generally draw. It just uses the RTL as shorthand notation and not a channel tool.
Last edited:
That's a good start. Missing are PP1, the OB's, PP1d. PP3a cannot be. Debrief PP6a and PP1b.
It's also beneficial to organize in logical groups. Which one's would you see in the early part of a developing trend? Which are seen in the later parts? Which are seen when an internal is in the mix?