Thanks for the explanation; I understand this. But still, it is still an art, not a science, that is why stop loss and money management is very important.
The arguement is that if one put every trade always against tech ana result, with tight MM and stop loss, and keep the winners, the result would be the same.
I did some back test on a dozen stocks -- i.e., put in trade against the tech. ana. always tell, with good MM, the result is almost the same as follow tech indicator,
In another word, tech ana. does not offer me an edge, it is the stop loss with small loss of the losers, and keep the winners running part that gives the edge, with iron hard decipline.
The arguement is that if one put every trade always against tech ana result, with tight MM and stop loss, and keep the winners, the result would be the same.
I did some back test on a dozen stocks -- i.e., put in trade against the tech. ana. always tell, with good MM, the result is almost the same as follow tech indicator,
In another word, tech ana. does not offer me an edge, it is the stop loss with small loss of the losers, and keep the winners running part that gives the edge, with iron hard decipline.