Make ET great again, unban Ricter, railroaded by the rantings of a feeble mind (Tsing Tao callout)

[Cuddles]

Ricter was banned by unsubstantiated accusations from another poster on this site who's clearly spiraling down into paranoia. Normally I wouldn't care, but this injustice should be rectified. As someone who unknowingly may have caused Ricter's banning, I feel it's my duty to bring this up. If Ricter violated terms of service other than what's shown below, then I apologize, but being informed of his banning always struck me the wrong way.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Y'all can try as you may, but no amount of proxies and ip spoofing can save you when the posting language remains unchanged

 

[Cuddles]

Dissent against tyranny tends to have a unifying voice.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Dissent against tyranny tends to have a unifying voice.

A private entity may choose to "censor" a guest and not give him an audience. That person is welcome to go on another show, platform, social media page, or even start their own platform

 

[Cuddles]

And so the owners deserve to have all the facts, like a a push by deranged members to oust others from the board, or perhaps overzealous admins acting on mere rumors. Just as they're welcome to silence me for bringing these facts to light, them being a private entity and all.

 

[vanzandt]

Ricter was banned by unsubstantiated accusations from another poster on this site who's clearly spiraling down into paranoia. Normally I wouldn't care, but this injustice should be rectified. As someone who unknowingly may have caused Ricter's banning, I feel it's my duty to bring this up. If Ricter violated terms of service other than what's shown below, then I apologize, but being informed of his banning always struck me the wrong way.

I'm not following ya.... ? I think I missed this whole drama.
Are you saying you were Ricter then, and what TOS did he(you) violate? Or if not, how were you complicit in his banning?
And why bring this up now?
Who are all these new posters?

 

[Cuddles]

I'm not following ya.... ? I think I missed this whole drama.
Are you saying you were Ricter then, and what TOS did he(you) violate? Or if not, how were you complicit in his banning?
And why bring this up now?
Who are all these new posters?

I'm saying I was never Ricter, Tsing refused to drop it, reported some like-style posting to Magna, and got poor Ricter banned under "multiple accounts" accusations.

This after Tsing private messaged me shortly after I joined and saying my denial was "good enough" for him. Real chicken shit type of stuff. You know good old censoring dissenting voices.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

I'm not following ya.... ? I think I missed this whole drama.
Are you saying you were Ricter then, and what TOS did he(you) violate? Or if not, how were you complicit in his banning?
And why bring this up now?
Who are all these new posters?

Very disjointed and self indulgent thread. Thank you for your time.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I'm saying I was never Ricter, Tsing refused to drop it, reported some like-style posting to Magna, and got poor Ricter banned under "multiple accounts" accusations.

This after Tsing private messaged me shortly after I joined and saying my denial was "good enough" for him. Real chicken shit type of stuff. You know good old censoring dissenting voices.

Sure, buddy. I can't get Magna to do anything Magna doesn't want to. If he did something, he had a reason. I invite you to ask him. If I had a pet Magna, you'd have been banned long ago. At least you got the thread title right with the comment on "rantings". The source of the rantings, though, a little off.

I do, however, find this absolutely hilarious. You're now arguing against banning someone (who most people think is you anyway, but lets put that aside) after fighting tooth and nail to push the point that a private company can ban anyone they want.

You can't make this shit up!

 

[Cuddles]

Sure, buddy. I can't get Magna to do anything Magna doesn't want to. If he did something, he had a reason. I invite you to ask him.

I do, however, find this absolutely hilarious. You're now arguing against banning someone (who most people think is you anyway, but lets put that aside) after fighting tooth and nail to push the point that a private company can ban anyone they want.

You can't make this shit up!

But you're the one that's getting people banned after saying doxxing and censoring is wrong. Like I said, ET is welcome to ban whoever they want, and Ricter may have had other accounts for why he was, but me getting contacted after the fact leads me to believe your delusional snitching gained traction. I'm merely correcting the record.