Majority of UK covid hospitalizations are fully vaxxed

You seem to be arguing with conditional strawmen... I said it would be impossible to show masks work... if you included all that data. T

and...


If you are commenting part of my statement... regarding the 6000 person study.


https://www.thelocal.dk/20201118/da...masks-protect-wearer-from-covid-19-infection/


“The study thereby fails to confirm the expected halving of risk of infection for the wearer of the face mask, but the results could suggest a moderate level of protection of 15-20 percent,” the Danish-language press statement notes.

“According to the study authors, their findings offer evidence about the degree of protection mask wearers can anticipate in a setting where others are not wearing masks and where other public health measures, including social distancing, are in effect,” reads the English-language counterpart.

“The findings, however, should not be used to conclude that a recommendation for everyone to wear masks in the community would not be effective in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections, because the trial did not test the role of masks in source control (transmission from an infected person to others) of SARS-CoV-2 infection,” it adds.

Neither did the study examine the effects of face masks in s





UsualName said:
I have looked at the data and if yours and tsing tao’s interpretation is mask do not work then you’re both dumb and should have the self awareness to know so and should not be sharing your stupid opinions on Covid with anyone. Take that stupid shit somewhere else.
More...
 
LacesOut said:
Massive spikes in cases also occur post gene therapy.
These ‘vaccines’ are a total dud.
More...

You mean the gene therapy that is driving the mortality rate down? Goes ask India about spikes and if there needs to gene therapy for that to happen.
 
jem said:
You seem to be arguing with conditional strawmen... I said it would be impossible to show masks work... if you included all that data. T

and...


If you are commenting part of my statement... regarding the 6000 person study.


https://www.thelocal.dk/20201118/da...masks-protect-wearer-from-covid-19-infection/


“The study thereby fails to confirm the expected halving of risk of infection for the wearer of the face mask, but the results could suggest a moderate level of protection of 15-20 percent,” the Danish-language press statement notes.

“According to the study authors, their findings offer evidence about the degree of protection mask wearers can anticipate in a setting where others are not wearing masks and where other public health measures, including social distancing, are in effect,” reads the English-language counterpart.

“The findings, however, should not be used to conclude that a recommendation for everyone to wear masks in the community would not be effective in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections, because the trial did not test the role of masks in source control (transmission from an infected person to others) of SARS-CoV-2 infection,” it adds.

Neither did the study examine the effects of face masks in s
More...

You’re so stupid. Again with this “masks do not protect the wearer” stuff. We know. Masks reduce spread, not contraction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top