Majority of Americans Favor Gun Control Laws, Poll Shows

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

....I dont think it will stop all mass shootings

You are correct, it won't.

but I think it will be effective at reducing mass shootings.

You are incorrect, it won't.

The millions in circulation wont stay in circulation at the levels they are now...

Yes they will, most weapons used in crimes are stolen; not purchased.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:


Yes they will, most weapons used in crimes are stolen; not purchased.

Owners will do a better job protecting their guns when they know they cant be replaced

The movie theater shooter , the V tech shooter, the Columbine shooter and sandy hook shooters guns were bought not stolen

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Owners will do a better job protecting their guns when they know they cant be replaced

"Better" how exactly? They cost the same whether they can be replaced or not. Suggesting people don't care if their easily replaced but expensive weapons don't care if they're stolen doesn't pass the common sense test.

The movie theater shooter , the V tech shooter, the Columbine shooter and sandy hook shooters guns were bought not stolen

Columbine shooters had someone else buy most their weapons, in violation of 20 separate firearms laws but yes they were purchased. Sandy Hook shooter stole them from his mother or so I was led to believe. In any case I said MOST are stolen, which IS absolutely true. Once again, you focus on the exceptions and treat them as the rule when it suits you.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

The people had a direct vote on Obamacare last month and you know how that turned out

That wasn't a direct vote on Obamacare, and you know that as well.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

That wasn't a direct vote on Obamacare, and you know that as well.

AK 47 is a rationalization a minute. He thinks Obama is comparable to Super Man for Christ's sake.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

"Better" how exactly? They cost the same whether they can be replaced or not. Suggesting people don't care if their easily replaced but expensive weapons don't care if they're stolen doesn't pass the common sense test.


Columbine shooters had someone else buy most their weapons, in violation of 20 separate firearms laws but yes they were purchased. Sandy Hook shooter stole them from his mother or so I was led to believe. In any case I said MOST are stolen, which IS absolutely true. Once again, you focus on the exceptions and treat them as the rule when it suites you.

Rather then leave their guns in their cars they might take them inside with them so a car thief wont get their gun if they steal their car.Rather then leaving their guns unsecured inside their homes they might buy a good gun safe to that if their house is burglarized the thief cant get their guns.I have friends and family that leave their guns in their glove compartments,trunks and unsecured in their bedrooms and they don't give a shit if they get stolen because they have insurance.If they knew they couldn't replace their guns with insurance money I know they would invest in gun safes and not leave their guns in their cars.Maybe Lanzas mom would have kept her guns in a gun safe if she knew she couldn't replace them in the event of a burglary and her crazy son might not have been able to take them

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

AK 47 is a rationalization a minute. He thinks Obama is comparable to Super Man for Christ's sake.

It was clear luke ,vote out Obama you vote out Obamacare

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

It was clear luke ,vote out Obama you vote out Obamacare

Wouldn't there need to be a republican controlled senate as well?
Besides, the welfare/entitlement class that now outnumbers the productive tax payer wasn't even concerned about Obamacare. They aren't paying for it anyway.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Rather then leave their guns in their cars they might take them inside with them so a car thief wont get their gun if they steal their car.Rather then leaving their guns unsecured inside their homes they might buy a good gun safe to that if their house is burglarized the thief cant get their guns.I have friends and family that leave their guns in their glove compartments,trunks and unsecured in their bedrooms and they don't give a shit if they get stolen because they have insurance.If they knew they couldn't replace their guns with insurance money I know they would invest in gun safes and not leave their guns in their cars.Maybe Lanzas mom would have kept her guns in a gun safe if she knew she couldn't replace them in the event of a burglary and her crazy son might not have been able to take them

Really? THIS is your rationalization? Why did I even ask.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

Really? THIS is your rationalization? Why did I even ask.

Humans tend to better protect and secure things the more valuable they are.A ban on future sales of certain guns makes those guns more valuable to the people who currently own them.Didn't think that was very hard to understand