MAGAlover in NewZealand goes on killing spree; 49 dead; livestreams murder

What are you rambling about? The items in this article are the pieces of contrary evidence being left out by the MSM... The items I highlighted in red from the manifesto are not right wing views IMO, which was the article's point. Did you actually read the Q and A from the article? Those are his questions to himself and his answers according to the article. At least you admit there are contrary ideas going on with this guy. That means you understand he has left wing ideas mixed in.

You have lumped me in a group of "you guys" accusing the left of being a Muslim appeaser. Please find a quote of mine which validates that statement. The only thing I would accuse certain lefties of is being close minded, intolerant, self important control freaks who aren't as intelligent as they brag to be. Maybe you fall into that category. Maybe not. My view of Islam and other religion is the same as my view of race. There is good and bad.

Regarding your comment regarding fault: It's not my fault, or for that fact, your fault that this guy killed innocents. It's his own fucking fault. You didn't do it, I didn't do it. He did it. It's on him. Do you understand that concept? Accountability? No, you don't.

Lastly, I didn't state my opinion of Trump one way or the other. That is your assumption.
My only comment was in the first two sentences. I didn't mention Trump, the manifesto did...once. Everything below my comment and the article link is from the article. Everything in your response regarding me is assumption. I've never posted anything in this forum about Trump or any opinion I might have of him.

I'll bet it bothers the shit out of you that this self proclaimed white supremacist has left wing views. Don't worry, though. CNN and the others won't let it get out.

Fascism is very much a right wing view.
 
Fascism is very much a right wing view.
Is aligning one's view with communist China?

Look, Money, this guy stated he wanted to create (political) chaos from his actions. That reminds me of Alinsky, who was not a right winger. It sounds to me like this guy had many conflicted views, but only the right wing views are being reported. It gets tiresome getting broad brushed to further the left wing agenda every time a whack job cracks . The media has played right into this guys desires.
 
Last edited:
What are you rambling about? The items in this article are the pieces of contrary evidence being left out by the MSM... The items I highlighted in red from the manifesto are not right wing views IMO, which was the article's point. Did you actually read the Q and A from the article? Those are his questions to himself and his answers according to the article. At least you admit there are contrary ideas going on with this guy. That means you understand he has left wing ideas mixed in.

You have lumped me in a group of "you guys" accusing the left of being a Muslim appeaser. Please find a quote of mine which validates that statement. The only thing I would accuse certain lefties of is being close minded, intolerant, self important control freaks who aren't as intelligent as they brag to be. Maybe you fall into that category. Maybe not. My view of Islam and other religion is the same as my view of race. There is good and bad.

Regarding your comment regarding fault: It's not my fault, or for that matter, your fault that this guy killed innocents. It's his own fucking fault. You didn't do it, I didn't do it. He did it. It's on him. Do you understand that concept? Accountability?

Lastly, I didn't state my opinion of Trump one way or the other. That is your assumption. My only comment was in the first two sentences. I didn't mention Trump, the manifesto did...once. Everything below my comment and the article link is from the article. Everything in your response regarding me is assumption. I've never posted anything in this forum about Trump or any opinion I might have of him.

I'll bet it bothers the shit out of you that this self proclaimed white supremacist has left wing views. Don't worry, though. CNN and the others won't let it get out.

I asked you a very simple question - why would a lefty praise Trump for white identity politics and consider Candace Owens his inspiration while shooting up a Muslim place of worship - how the fuck do you resolve that contradiction?

You don't want to deal with specific facts, you want to rant about irrelevant out of context nonsense instead.
 
I asked you a very simple question - why would a lefty praise Trump for white identity politics and consider Candace Owens his inspiration while shooting up a Muslim place of worship - how the fuck do you resolve that contradiction?

You don't want to deal with specific facts, you want to rant about irrelevant out of context nonsense instead.

You either completely missed the point of my post or you simply can't accept the parts of the manifesto that you don't agree with. Nothing in the manifesto of a mass murderer should be considered irrelevant.

To answer your question...I resolve the contradiction by reading the entire manifesto. You should do the same and do it with an open mind. He obviously had conflicting views.

He stated that his current views are aligned most closely with that of China...a country actively persecuting Muslims. Factor that in.
 
Is aligning one's view with communist China?

Look, Money, this guy stated he wanted to create (political) chaos from his actions. That reminds me of Alinsky, who was not a right winger. It sounds to me like this guy had many conflicted views, but only the right wing views are being reported. It gets tiresome getting broad brushed to further the left wing agenda every time a whack job cracks . The media has played right into this guys desires.

Hard to parse where the guy was trolling and where the guy is serious. What we know is he acted on views and targeted the Muslim community in overlap with rhetoric expressed by Trump. The guy could not have been trolling and just been a complete nut job, in which case all bets are off. This is in differentiation of other coherent nut jobs that go on killing sprees.

If he's an anarchist and just wanted to create chaos by expressing conflicting views, then his action were still racist as he didn't target indiscriminately.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wjk
Hard to parse where the guy was trolling and where the guy is serious. What we know is he acted on views and targeted the Muslim community in overlap with rhetoric expressed by Trump. The guy could not have been trolling and just been a complete nut job, in which all bets are off. This is in differentiation of other coherent nut jobs that go on killing sprees.

Agreed. I wonder now if that wasn't by design because he knew that such praise by itself would create more hate between left and right in the US. He made comments about his actions being designed to create strife, including the 2nd amendment in the US. Why would he praise Trump in one part of the manifesto while stating a complete hatred of conservatism in another?
 
You either completely missed the point of my post or you simply can't accept the parts of the manifesto that you don't agree with. Nothing in the manifesto of a mass murderer should be considered irrelevant.

To answer your question...I resolve the contradiction by reading the entire manifesto. You should do the same and do it with an open mind. He obviously had conflicting views.

He stated that his current views are aligned most closely with that of China...a country actively persecuting Muslims. Factor that in.

You are parsing the manifesto for generic comments while ignoring the DIRECT pointers to Trump, alt-right and rest of the racist tirades. Look at the kind of shit he was posting, there is no difference between him and your typical Donald supporter.
 
Sounds like a Trump Supporter when he says:

Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?

As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.
 
Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.

And? Even the extreme inbreds other than you are smart enough to know that Trump is not a 'policy maker', the demented 72 year old grandpa won't even able to spell it.
 
Back
Top