Madoff story - in bottom line - just story of 'redistributing' of capital, although it caused a lot of pain.. Let's think for a moment about what we know:
- he accepted a lot of money (billions)
- he probably took some fees, but not significant part of the money, thus billions of investment gone somewhere(considering no much trading if any). Where? Just redistributed as 'gains' for earlier 'investors'. Ponzi scheme at its best.. Kind of Robin Hood, taking from one giving to other. The difference though he took people money with no violence... People gave him money sought 'solid' investment with 10% yearly - how frugal

. No risk and 10% yearly - what a genious, he's definitely different, it's not what you think, it's just talented individual, almost Buffet, no, don't ask about holdings - look at those invested with him just 5 years ago - he doesn't lie, how comes, his investments just never go down, never, and don't ask me anymore - just look at him ... BTW, why these people didn't buy Berkshire - it's totally transparent, better then 10%, less money to get in.. Aaah, yes, there is a risk in Berkshire, Buffet gives no warranty, I see.. Here they got peace of mind, and they fully paid it off..
Like great Einstein said once: 'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.'
Don't talk about retirement/charity/etc.. - Madoff isn't only person taking it from people, may be a scale is different. Ponzi, btw, was interrogated by policemen, who invested their money - as almost everyone in Boston that time - in his company - that was good catch

..
The problem is that these retirees/charity fund managers didn't learn from their mom/dad about free lunch..
All above, however , doesn't mean Madoff should get a leniency - at least in my opinion he must spent a rest of his life in jail - because he broke the law ....