Then, all you have to do is fade me. You'll make a fortune. I figure until about the time they mark the books for the year. then, what do you do for the encore?Quote from bwolinsky:
I don't think you know what you're talking about, and I also believe that you're an extreme alarmist. While the total $50 billion was enough to move the market, the fact is it doesn't exist, so there won't be any selloff. Couple that with the lowering of rates next tuesday, and, yeah, we'll be a lot higher.
Extreme alarmist? Use the search feature, and hope I'm as wrong as I have been right. I don't make the stuff up. This isn't something I picked out of my ass. It is factual. It is what is happening. How can you call anyone an alarmist when the financial landscape looks like the moon? I certainly take a harder look at things I might have thought a bit looney a few years ago.
But I do have to say, it's pretty easy for me to look at the news flow, and figure what's next.
Have you noticed, as much as I badgered the SEC over the years, did you see the din pickup this afternoon, when the folks realized they were there, and let this whole thing pass? Search 'SEC' with "Madoff" and see what you get. SEC/DC political. That's what you need to know.
Now look what we were talking about a few weeks ago.
I believe you'll have to see arrests of personnel at the SEC. The public won't allow these transgressions to go unanswered.
This is from today's WSJ Law Journal:
An executive in the securities industry, Harry Markopolos, contacted the SEC's Boston office in May 1999, urging regulators to investigate Mr. Madoff. Mr. Markopolos continued to pursue his accusations over the past nine years, he said in an interview on Thursday, and according to documents he sent to the SEC that were reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
"Bernie Madoff's returns aren't real and if they are real, then they would almost certainly have been generated by front-running customer order flow from the broker-dealer arm of Madoff Investment Securities LLC," Mr. Markopolos wrote to the SEC in November 2005.
The SEC declined to comment on the matter.
Hello!!!!! Anyone home??? What 's the problem here???
