Does it matters if its real or fake?
Not sure if you’re asking rhetorically or literally… ? But if you
are asking me — whether he’s legit or not seemed to (partly) be what the OP was asking -- and a number of the subsequent responses have suggested that he's a fake trader. So in response to the OP’s question, I thought that some of the things he showed in the video might help to prove that he is a "real trader," and that his PnL may be real.
His strategy is base on level 2 and tape reading. Are you able to replicate it as a student/sub?
First, I've never taken his course, so I don't know the details about what he teaches or how well he teaches it. But like virtually any skill, Level 2 and tape reading
can be taught successfully.
Second -- even if I did know the details about his teaching, who am I to say whether someone else is capable of replicating what he does or not? For almost every strategy or approach that I've seen taught, there at least
appear to be some people who are able to apply it successfully... although obviously I have no way of knowing that for sure (i.e., I haven't seen their audited brokerage statements, etc.).
That being said — I'd also
guess that the vast majority of traders fail,
regardless of what approach they're learning or who's teaching it, and for reasons that don't always have to do with the strategy or the teacher. But I'm not the type of person to put limits on what you or anyone else is capable of learning or doing, and certainly not based on my own limitations.
When asked what's his risk level. His risk level is if he sees the stock is going strong he would stop his short.
That's sorta why I suggested that his approach may be too difficult/dangerous for most traders, especially beginners. But again, I don't know the details of what he teaches, and risk level is often scalable relative to one's own account size and risk tolerance.
So what u gonna learn from here without years of screen time on tape
Again, I'm not sure about what exactly he teaches. But if your emphasis is on the fact that it'll likely take years to learn and be successful -- do you know of any trading course/method/approach where that
isn't true? Do you know of many comparable professions that don't take years to reach success?
But *if* he's selling his course/service by claiming that a student can easily and quickly become successful at trading, then I'd say that's misleading... and to the degree that he's suggesting that, whether directly or implicitly, a "scam" in that sense -- regardless of whether he's a real, highly profitable trader who may be teaching valid methods (or not).