Australian 90-day bill IR’s are looking bit mispriced to me. Z8-M9 inverted from 10+ in H1 to -3 negative, so M9 can be shorted for positive roll-down. I suppose there was an element of –IBOR/OIS widening, but with Z8-M9 inverted it’s hard to argue that any hiking is still priced in.
Data has not been supportive for RBA to be hawkish in the short run but it’s not that bad to reduce it to a 50% probability of a hike in just 2020H1 (M9-M0 of 14 bps). Data has been robust:
- Average of all Australian PMI’s down to 52.5 from 55.5 average in 2018
- TD securities inflation going nowhere for 8 months from 2-2.1% yoy
- Q2 core and services CPI weaker than in Q1
- Q2 wage growth going nowhere from around 2% yoy
- Trade balance has been deteriorating until the last reading.
- No Q2 gdp yet, though Q1 was good.
- Building approvals, financing of new housing, house prices weakened significantly
- On the other hand, secondary market financing is still okay.
- AS51 doing good, big 4 stock prices not trashed
- Biz confidence okay
- Retail sales doing okay, around 2y average yoy
- Infl expectations stable around 4% for a long time
- Unemployment keeps going down, but still more than 1% away from 2008-lows (clear overheating level)
- China had its stimulus, so like always could get higher ore demand.
Political situation is a non-event. Both parties would spend money but the difference is how: private consumption via tax cuts or public consumption via higher spending.
I suppose it’s the political developments that brought AUDNZD back to below 1.09. IMO it’s not gone up to reflect that the new governor of RBNZ is more dovish:
- Wheeler didn’t flirt with idea of cutting rates.
- Wheeler claimed that their stance would remain the same under dual mandate.
- Orr has been explicit that rate cut is likely and talked that weak GDP would be a condition for that.
- I see no significant data deterioration for RBNZ between Wheeler and now.
- RBNZ seems to be more dovish now without change in fundamentals.