Quote from Andy62279:
Yes, I am familiar with those. Yes, in those cases the zero line filter would be good. Or, enter earlier and move stop to breakeven sooner resulting in breakeven trades is another alternative. I traded RD's when I traded the euro/usd. I found the zero line to be a bit slow for the market and timeframe I traded. Of course, there is no right or wrong answers here. That rule just did not suit me.
As far as profit taking. Since Rd's for me were not very reliable setup, I needed larger return/risk trades. 1R trades would give me a negative expectancy. For exit strategy I like to give the market plenty of room for growth. I go far larger trades. I get a lot of breakeven trades, but the more prices move then the less profits I'm willing to give up. This is my style.
Quote from tradersaavy:
Profit taking.
Regarding the zero line cross being late, this is a very debatable subject. You know those divergences that keep going for a while creating more divergences before finally reversing? Waiting for the zero line cross or a trend line break of some sort can help on these occasions.
Quote from nwbprop:
I like your post. I just wanted to chime in on what I do and how it differs from what you mention. I use a bigger timeframe to get an overall bias of the market. I then use the shorter timeframe for entries and stops to catch a bunch of the longer timeframe trends.
I have never been able to really put it all together where I can scalp within the overall position trades as some very accomplished traders do; Grob109, Scientist, AMT.
I think that is the ultimate goal. Have position trades and scalping within your overall position to maximize gains.