Quote from Allaces:
No.. it's just you
One more time for amateur hour..
an MA cross represents the trend.. the zero line cross represents momentum.. therefore an MA cross to the upside which starts below the zero line merely means the trend has turned bullish but has no momentum behind it yet.. a true bullish MA cross occurs above the zero line and vice versa for shorts
This from the loser that needs help with his 2K IB accountQuote from Capablanca:
So it seems there are people who do not know how to calculate the MACD but are trying to explain a strategy based on it. A simple two MA crossovers strategy at that.
At least it helps to clarify who the high school dropouts in this thread are.

Quote from 28T:
Everyone knows how to calculate it ya dopey bugger, the trick is interpreting it correctly.. jeez you'd think evolution would have killed off humans this stupid
Oh please.. I have a profitable method that makes me a fortune.. I've never wasted my time on Jack's poorly formed NLP.. I'm not a sucker that needs to be told there is a method out there that never takes a loss while reaping 3 times the daily range.. that shit is for suckers like you.. the fact that you are in his room tells me you are still looking to be profitable.. ie: the markets bitchQuote from Capablanca:
Apparently not everybody does, that's why they do not seem to be able to interpret it very well. MACD is a derivative of a 12 and 26 period MA. A cross of the zero line is the same thing as a 12 26 MA crossover. You saying it isn't?
If it comes down to this MACD method or Spydertrader's Hershey method I give the edge to the latter. It was profitable while I was looking at it. So run along now and attempt to decipher Hershey's doublespeak and separate the grain from the chaff if you can. Considering your level of expertise with MACD, however, I get the feeling it may prove beyond your ken and that of your alter ego.
