Get your strategy to the point where it meets this standard
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MECE_principle
and you won't worry about "luck".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MECE_principle
and you won't worry about "luck".
Quote from jnbadger:
Sounds like a difference of opinion as to the definition of "luck".
I don't think anything you just described has anything to do with luck.
Granted, you need to continuously put yourself in a position to be lucky, but watching a movie and missing a trade has nothing to do with being unlucky. That's just a lack of effort.
Quote from Bry:
However, the best traders are probably the luckiest too. Their subconscious minds prod them to get into a trade at just the right time. Or their hard work, watching the market for hours and hours until they feel the timing is right to get in makes them luckier than the lazy trader who is watching a movie instead.
moved to another level and see market as multidimensional. price action is one dimension only. I include now news, sentiment and fundamentals, one dimension each. PA is last one to wory about. However, I still have rule to papertrade after 3 risks down from high account point, just in case. [/B]
Quote from colonial dr:
Myself and others had a discussion about traders, both new and old, confusing nice equity curves as real trading when it is just luck.
A hundred descretionary trades can easily be luck- imo. Especially when draw downs between trades.
Old trades who have lost their skill or edge can also think it is good that they are at least holding together. This is luck too.
Have you ever thought you had an edge or skill, but found out over the longer term that it was just luck that proved to be a false theory?
I would also love to hear anybody who has ideas about how to quantify luck in trading.