+1.
Any trader that disregards risk is a total idiot, period.
End of story and case closed.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Looks like Victor Niederhoffer blew up again
- Thread starter VictorBustoAgain
- Start date
+1.
Any trader that disregards risk is a total idiot, period.
End of story and case closed.
Vic Niederhoffer â@VicNiederhoffer Apr 11
looks very bullish for spu . one augments his position.
Vic Niederhoffer â@VicNiederhoffer Apr 10
as wellington would say " into the breach . their horses are mired" one buys spu at close with abandon
doesn't sound all that rigorous. no wonder he got a drubbing.
looks very bullish for spu . one augments his position.
Vic Niederhoffer â@VicNiederhoffer Apr 10
as wellington would say " into the breach . their horses are mired" one buys spu at close with abandon
doesn't sound all that rigorous. no wonder he got a drubbing.
Senile ramblings of a lifetime bustout. If this is really him, then this guy is worse than I ever thought. Wow. He doesn't have any clue what his reputation really is. What's the line...something like: "if he met his reputation in the street, he wouldn't recognize it/himself".
The guy is simply a degenerate. An action "junkie". No wonder he hates Buffett. Soros was lucky Victor didn't blow up on his watch. It could have happened, and Soros knew it.
https://twitter.com/VicNiederhoffer
The guy is simply a degenerate. An action "junkie". No wonder he hates Buffett. Soros was lucky Victor didn't blow up on his watch. It could have happened, and Soros knew it.
https://twitter.com/VicNiederhoffer
One thing for which we can all agree.
LMFAO! Fees on 30% plus annual verified returns from 1982 to 1996 pays for a lot of losses and provides a fat lifestyle for a century plus-- not to mention returns on his own capital. These posts can't be real. LOL!!
You're wrong. He was relatively small time (compared to his MARHedge rep) until attracting the Octane money. It's on the books that he's lost over $600MM yet you act as though you're his CPA. There is no f*cking way he's ahead over the years (>$600MM organic growth). At Soros he managed roughly $50MM at the peak.
You're wrong. He was relatively small time (compared to his MARHedge rep) until attracting the Octane money. It's on the books that he's lost over $600MM yet you act as though you're his CPA. There is no f*cking way he's ahead over the years (>$600MM organic growth). At Soros he managed roughly $50MM at the peak.
Yeah, compared to the fund sizes today he was small time. However, back in the day 50-100mm was considered huge.
Yeah, compared to the fund sizes today he was small time. However, back in the day 50-100mm was considered huge.
Admirable size for the times, but it doesn't translate to $600MM. He didn't leave with the money.
Admirable size for the times, but it doesn't translate to $600MM. He didn't leave with the money.
Start with a low AUM of 20mm just as an example -- 30% per year compounded for 24 years is huge money. Figure it out.
Start with a low AUM of 20mm just as an example -- 30% per year compounded for 24 years is huge money. Figure it out.
"figure it out"
usual nonsense
"figure it out"
usual nonsense
Have a problem with math?