Quote from Cutten:
Was it a mistake though? Prices in commodities are not speculations on far future value in the same way that as stocks are. Commodity prices are set by immediate supply & demand needs mostly, albeit speculation can swing things up and down for a while. Industry needed oil in late 2007 and H2 2008, and was prepared to pay $100-147 a barrel for it. And don't forget that part of the reason prices are lower now is because they went so high. The cause of low prices is prior high prices, and vice versa.
Also, part of the reason the market was wrong was because of the distorting effect on credit of a Fed easing cycle. The Fed cutting made rates go lower than normal, encouraging more lending. Their reaction to a weakening financial system ironically exaggerated investment in the one remaining healthy part of the economy, causing excessive prices, and now a subsequent bigger than necessary bust the other direction.
This is part of the argument against central banks - they cause overinvestment. Each time they respond to one sector getting into trouble, they cause overinvestment and speculative excess in other sectors, thus setting up the next bust. An infinite bubble-blowing machine.
Short term solutions for a much too complex world for individuals.
Though, their roles is giving a human face to all that is happening.
People can find some informations through their body expressions of the information they are giving to the media.
No central banks would mean de-personalization of the process, risking to make people more cynical than they are right now, even if it looks like pure propaganda and marketing strategies.
Catch-22..the least-evil.
