Quote from Hitnruntrader:
Hey bud.
I disagree with what you are saying.
We can debate this forever and there will be no winner.
If someone is new and losing 300-500 per day, they are probably not cut out for this biz.
There are many different styles of trading. I happen to scalp the naz. I like to scalp anything in play and I prefer stocks in the 3$ to 10$ price range.
For a newbie to learn this style is not to difficult. To master it will take a very long time. The key is not to make to many trades and to have fairly tight stops. The trader will never make that much trading 100 lots but they will not lose alot either. If they are patient and don't smash keys all day, they can easily survive. The key is to get consistant profits over time. Then they can slowly increase size. Even going from 100 to 200 shares is a huge step. They are actually putting on twice as much size.
This is one method where it could work.
As far as trading pairs and opens, I would think the trader would need to put on selective trades and really define his risk tolerance. If he is going to try opens, then only put bids and offers on a few stocks so they get very few fills in the start. The last thing you want is a newbie with 5 open positions.
Maybe they could put there bids and offers even a little further outside the area where most open order traders put theres. THis way they will have fewer fills. Its hard for me to really know if it would work for opens cuz I have never traded them. I am just throwing out possibilities.
As for my method, I know it can work. To start with 25K and being prepared to lose it sounds nuts to me. I think it is better to go in very light and just install major rules into your makeup.
Just my opinion.
Happy Trading.
No, there is a winner. It's ME! LOL. Kidding aside, look, even losing $100 a day over 6 months will cost you 12k. That is enough to blow out a 5k or 12k account. It's very easy to talk about what traders shouldn't do, the bottom line is, that's not reality. All new traders make the same mistakes, which is fine. It's just that 5k and 10k just isn't enough.
I also disagree with the notion that guys that lose 300 to 500 a day are not cut out for this business. When I worked at Worldco, the best traders went knee deep in the hole. Some guys were down 50k to 100k before they got out. They turned out to be our best traders. The guys that actually were playing it safe never really made it. Sure they never went that deep in the hole but they made anything either. Sooner or later you need to get aggressive and trade. If you think a guy is going to learn how to trade and keep his losses to under $50 a day, well, I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree. I run a prop office and I've traded with hundreds of guys in the prop world. I know the reality of the business.
Are there outlier guys out there on the far end of the bell curve that by chance made it through 6 months losing less then 5k who also became profitable traders and are very successful today? Sure, statistically speaking there must be. But I think it's disingenuous to use an outlier to make an argument.
Nobody wants to lose 25k. Hell, nobody wants to lose 1k. But that is not how you look at it. You are not going to LOSE 25k. You are going to learn how to trade. I didn't go to college saying, wow, I'm going to lose 100k to get this degree. I PAID for that degree. With the idea that the degree would pay me dividends in the future. That is the same with trading. You are not going to LOSE 25k. You are going to LEARN how to trade. Some guys that education might only cost them 10k or 15k, some guys it might cost 100k. Does the guy that went to Harvard and paid 100k for his education feel worse then the guy that paid 20k to go to Northern Illinois. Probably not. Different people need different things. You are acting as if they are throwing that money into the wind betting on black at the roulette table. That is not the case.


