Looking for a free .pdf of this book

dcwriter2 said:
Taught media law for six years. You can make or acquire a single copy of a single piece of content for your own use -- except reselling it.
More...

You can make a copy of content (for yourself) AFTER you have purchased it. If we can all make a single copy without purchasing it then the writer literally makes nothing... are you even thinking about what you are writing? You are lying about teaching media law.
 
Also, it is obviously an violation of the law to store a copy of any copyrighted material and share it with anyone else.
 
dcwriter2 said:
Taught media law for six years. You can make or acquire a single copy of a single piece of content for your own use -- except reselling it. Seriously. Back in the days when Xeroxing and carbon copies were the only ways to copy, this was sufficient. In the digital age, though, the law just hasn't caught up with the technology and only really applies to people who make a business out of collecting and usually reselling digitized print content. If you know of another legal opinion, I'd like to hear it.
More...


Are you really that dumb? Why would anyone need more than a “single copy” or “single piece” of a book or a song and only need to purchase a second copy? Do you just steal a book and then pay for the 2nd copy?
And why would “make” or “acquire” mean allowing stealing?
No one would even write useful books. And there would be no need for copyright law, or commercial books, art or music. Musicians/artists already complain about getting screwed by Spotify and other music distributors. While there are plenty of lawsuits involving copyright laws, whether regarding books or music.
 
Why not just go to a library? It’s paid for by your taxes...Interlibrary loan will help you find obscure titles.

Authors like Rob Carver save new traders substantial money and time. Something to think about IMHO
 
dcwriter2 said:
Taught media law for six years. You can make or acquire a single copy of a single piece of content for your own use -- except reselling it. Seriously. Back in the days when Xeroxing and carbon copies were the only ways to copy, this was sufficient. In the digital age, though, the law just hasn't caught up with the technology and only really applies to people who make a business out of collecting and usually reselling digitized print content. If you know of another legal opinion, I'd like to hear it.
More...


Lol. Perfect, champ.
 
dcwriter2 said:
You can make or acquire a single copy of a single piece of content for your own use
More...
Since you "taught media law for six years," you should have no problem providing us a cite. Thanks.

tenor.gif
 
RedSun said:
But your internet provider can record your traffic and they could send you a notice for copyright infringement. The author may not get to you, but that does not mean you are doing it legally
More...

I can almost guarantee NO internet provider is doing this.

What is possible and what is probable are different things and wannabe smart people love to conflate the 2.
 
albion said:
You can make a copy of content (for yourself) AFTER you have purchased it. If we can all make a single copy without purchasing it then the writer literally makes nothing... are you even thinking about what you are writing? You are lying about teaching media law.
More...

Taught at Lynn University, Florida Atlantic University and the University of Technology, Sydney, in Australia. I wish I could say calling someone a liar was defamation but I would have to show damages. Your interpretation of copyright law is commonsensical, perhaps, but not the way the law is implemented. I assume the person who provides me with a .pdf obtained it legally and is not running a business selling copies. If I know otherwise I MAY be guilty of copyright infringement. I think this is my final statement on this obviously touchy subject. Go ask a lawyer, if you have questions or want to debate. Frankly, I'm too busy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top