Well, that's what happened in 2011 - the vol of vol increased so much on the back of a spike in the index that puts that should have become worthless barely changed in price. So if you are using that strategy to hedge something it's not going to work as well as the delta implies.A +5p jump in /VX brings a 0.6 delta put down to 0.00 for M1.
High odds are that you will end up flat or lose a little on the trade - daycount adjusted we had pretty cheap vix levels in the recent past, so I think 11 to 12 is the expected settlement value. However, if there is a small vol spike (and it persists enough) you might make the premium.That's pretty much my point.![]()
How long do most vol spikes persist? If they aren't of 2008 proportions, maybe a week at most IIRC. Maybe it is better to sell the weekly put... Based on what you're saying, the short put strategy requires a long-lived vol spike in order to profit.High odds are that you will end up flat or lose a little on the trade - daycount adjusted we had pretty cheap vix levels in the recent past, so I think 11 to 12 is the expected settlement value. However, but if there is a small vol spike (and it persists enough) you might make the premium.
So if you are doing it as an outright way to be long vol, sure, go for it. If you are doing it as a way to hedge your book, it's not a greatest way to do so.
Would do certainly better, than the purchase of VX futures / OTM VIX calls / etc, on a constant basis over the past 4 years or so.High odds are that you will end up flat or lose a little on the trade

I'd say execution is everything, and overall VIX settlement levels could provide a hint on the "sure" loss potential.Based on what you're saying, the short put strategy requires a long-lived vol spike in order to profit.
You are suggesting a trade that is statistically (real world expectation, not Black Scholes) a loser or at best break-even and has a maximum upside of the premium collected. Trades above are also statistical losers (higher probability of loss, of course) but the upside is unlimited, at least in theory.Would do certainly better, than the purchase of VX futures / OTM VIX calls / etc, on a constant basis over the past 4 years or so.![]()
Some back-ratio could work, but it is dependent on many factors. I feel like 'legging-in' would make sense. Also, I could speculate, that the further months could present some better opportunities, for a longer time-frame.-- Maybe a better trade considering the term structure and expectation is to trade a 13/12 1x2 put spread?
VXX is a rolling index, every day it reallocates a little bit from the front contract to the second one. So, if the second contract is more expensive then the first one, even if the volatility stays constant, VXX locks-in a loss. So, if you think VIX is floored at some level and feel there is an edge to selling VIX puts, a put on VXX will still be collecting that rolldown. I have not looked at them so I don't know what the pricing looks like.I like VXX idea a lot - could you elaborate on it some more, if possible?
It could be viewed as a "mixed" VIX calendar spread, as you short the put in one month and long the put for the blend of M1/M2. I feel like the re-balancing 'feature' could make it pretty interesting; there are definitely multiple possibilities with this approach. My only concern is that these puts aren't necessarily cheap..
The old bit of wisdom says "legging a spread is like spreading the legs", with the relevant consequences. In general, you want to leg in a trade if you believe that both legs have alpha (btw, this might be one of those cases).I feel like 'legging-in' would make sense.
