K KINGOFSHORTS Sep 27, 2009 #11 Well the plan has to be better than what 98% of americans do which is blindly put money into high expense 401Ks.
Well the plan has to be better than what 98% of americans do which is blindly put money into high expense 401Ks.
D dagnyt Sep 28, 2009 #12 Quote from KINGOFSHORTS: Well the plan has to be better than what 98% of americans do which is blindly put money into high expense 401Ks. More... 98%. Surely you jest. I've told you a million times not to exaggerate. Mark
Quote from KINGOFSHORTS: Well the plan has to be better than what 98% of americans do which is blindly put money into high expense 401Ks. More... 98%. Surely you jest. I've told you a million times not to exaggerate. Mark
S spindr0 Sep 28, 2009 #13 Quote from KINGOFSHORTS: Well the plan has to be better than what 98% of americans do which is blindly put money into high expense 401Ks. More... The SEC is requesting comments on whether to rename them 201K plans or Certified Retirement Asset Plans
Quote from KINGOFSHORTS: Well the plan has to be better than what 98% of americans do which is blindly put money into high expense 401Ks. More... The SEC is requesting comments on whether to rename them 201K plans or Certified Retirement Asset Plans
C crgarcia Sep 29, 2009 #14 Quote from noob_trad3r: I was thinking what if I go long lets say SPY then write OTM calls on it (1month) then save the premium but reinvest premium on spy on any dips. keep writing OTMs etc.. and compounding. will this work okay? More... Why not buy a covered calls ETF instead? Or just buy LEAP calls?
Quote from noob_trad3r: I was thinking what if I go long lets say SPY then write OTM calls on it (1month) then save the premium but reinvest premium on spy on any dips. keep writing OTMs etc.. and compounding. will this work okay? More... Why not buy a covered calls ETF instead? Or just buy LEAP calls?
