I'd have to do a simulation to confirm that. I don't short so the calculation gymnastics isn't on my radar.The net effect is 100% identical to simultaneous long and short positions. Which part of that is unclear to you?
I'd have to do a simulation to confirm that. I don't short so the calculation gymnastics isn't on my radar.The net effect is 100% identical to simultaneous long and short positions. Which part of that is unclear to you?
I'd have to do a simulation to confirm that. I don't short so the calculation gymnastics isn't on my radar.
Yeah, I see what's going on under the hood. Basically, he wants to HEDGE his long. I often do something similar with ES and NQ. I would go long ES and when I make enough, instead of selling outright, I would short NQ.At the risk of adding to the confusion, I think what OP wants to do (I've asked that question a while back) is to buy long but also short that position from time to time. For example, buy XYZ at 1 sell at 5. If at 4 the price looks to reverse, short "a new group of shares" with a buy at 3, while leaving the original long alone. Does that make sense?
Yeah, I see what's going on under the hood. Basically, he wants to HEDGE his long. I often do something similar with ES and NQ. I would go long ES and when I make enough, instead of selling outright, I would short NQ.
But why would you wanna do that with the same instrument? The two gets cancelled out (eg. long and short simultaneously) and all you're doing is paying extra commissions for no obvious benefit.
PM me and I'll tell you
Thanks but there's really no need since you won't find any brokers that will allow you to hold both long and short positions at the same time.PM me and I'll tell you