London council moves to evict rioters

[Trader666]

London council moves to evict rioters
Anne Barker, wires
Updated August 13, 2011 10:42:05

Public housing tenants in London are facing the possibility of eviction over their involvement in the riots and looting that tore through English cities this week.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-13/london-council-moves-to-evict-rioters/2837708?section=world

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Trader666:

London council moves to evict rioters
Anne Barker, wires
Updated August 13, 2011 10:42:05

Public housing tenants in London are facing the possibility of eviction over their involvement in the riots and looting that tore through English cities this week.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-13/london-council-moves-to-evict-rioters/2837708?section=world

I wonder if thrown out, will they resort to rioting?

 

[Trader666]

If so they should get new subsidized housing in prison.

I hope the gov't follows through on this... these lowlifes are less than worthless, they're sub-human scum who deserve to be put out on the street.

Quote from Lucrum:

I wonder if thrown out, will they resort to rioting?

 

[acronym]

Throwing one person out of a household for criminal acts, may appear at face value, ( or mask value) to be reasonable. But throwing out an entire household, on the presumed basis of collective guilt, is entirely un-christian, un-british and un-democratic.

 

[Dragons Teeth]

Quote from acronym:

Throwing one person out of a household for criminal acts, may appear at face value, ( or mask value) to be reasonable. But throwing out an entire household, on the presumed basis of collective guilt, is entirely un-christian, un-british and un-democratic.

They have done it before so its not without precedent and its in the T&C of every council lease domestic or commercial.

 

[FightTheFuture]

Quote from acronym:

Throwing one person out of a household for criminal acts, may appear at face value, ( or mask value) to be reasonable. But throwing out an entire household, on the presumed basis of collective guilt, is entirely un-christian, un-british and un-democratic.

All the more incentive and pressure on each member to get the entire household to behave.

 

[nutmeg]

Quote from FightTheFuture:

All the more incentive and pressure on each member to get the entire household to behave.

This is against the Geneva convention.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Dragons Teeth:

They have done it before so its not without precedent and its in the T&C of every council lease domestic or commercial.

Wow, how very un-liberal of them.

 

[Due Buy]

Quote from acronym:

Throwing one person out of a household for criminal acts, may appear at face value, ( or mask value) to be reasonable. But throwing out an entire household, on the presumed basis of collective guilt, is entirely un-christian, un-british and un-democratic.

Well if they're being violent on the streets, and then you force them out of their homes and back onto the streets wouldn't that be enforcing their behavior making the punishment un-logical?