None of the Democrat candidates on stage have any possibility of beating Mr Trump. --it really doesn't matter who the nominee is. They are all equally unexciting, anti-Americans who will be eaten alive by Our President.
LOL these clowns debating right now...
- Thread starter dozu888
- Start date
So far anyway.
But you never know. As the primary "evolves" we may start seeing some candidates from Mexico enter the race and be on stage. Wouldn't that be progressive?
Probably not going to happen. We are not going to see candidates speaking spanish on stage. Wait. Lemme work with that a little more. I may need to revise that.
He got 3 million fewer votes in 2016 and 10 million fewer in 2018.It will more than 10 million in 2020.
Let's just see how polls have looked historically in the year prior to an election. I believe the reader, and you, can easily see that polling this far out means nothing as you may recall, Reagan won 49 states and would have won 50 if he just had another 1000 votes in Minnesota.
https://www.csmonitor.com/1983/0107/010717.html
Former Vice-President Walter Mondale and Sen. John Glenn of Ohio would both defeat President Reagan by wide margins if a presidential election were held now , according to a Gallup poll.
In the survey, Mr. Mondale outpolled Mr. Reagan by 52 to 40 percent and Mr. Glenn won by 54 to 39 percent, with the rest undecided. The Gallup survey sampled opinions of 1,116 registered voters nationwide in mid-December.
Last edited:
I would not underestimate Kamala vs Trump in a debate. She is driven, comes well prepared, and could very well put Trump through the wood chipper. Trump could become frustrated and his ensuing meltdown might make Chernobyl look like a grilled cheese sandwich in comparison, but with similar political repercussions.
If Trump underestimates her and does not take quality time to prepare for her, that is. I suspect Kamala’s approach is formulaic and predictable to at least a certain degree.
Although I have yet to see the democratic debates, I did see Kamala put some heat on William Barr. Barr, a prominent long time attorney and current US attorney general, refused to attend another round of hearings afterward. I’m sure more than a few of us can agree Trump is no Barr when it comes to the knowledge and skills as one might obtain by being in the legal profession for decades.
Whether Kamala’s skills are world class is debatable, but she certainly has skills that stand out. I like Presidential candidates who have skills that stand out. Too bad the Democratic Party has been overrun by Socialists who have gotten too much mileage out of identity politics and offers of free stuff paid for by the productive.
Reagan had a 50% average first term approval rating.Trump has a 39% average first term approval rating.Reagan had approval ratings as high as 68 in his first term,Trump has never been above 50.Reagan's opponent didn't get millions more votes than him in his first election.
I don't think Trump is the type of guy who prepares for anything. I grant him some well timed jabs in thrashing Hillary, but to an objective observer he lost those debates just the same. Kamala is another animal compared to Hillary, she may be rehearsed at times but she's got the "quickness" that comes from years of arguing cases. It's that kind of "in the moment" retort that wins debates, Trump would have no chance.
It has not been established yet that Kamala is a good and fierce debater. She has gaffed out and had to retract fairly often in freewheeling interviews.
Her "success" in the last debate was a pre-planned, pre-canned drive-by shooting which was going to be unleashed on Biden, per the campaign staff plan, regardless of what Joe said or did that night. Not saying that is bad, and not saying that it is not good for her to have that support and capability in her camp- because it is good. Just sayin her debate skills have not been established in my mind.
Also, she needs to get past Fauxco to reach Trump and Fauxco is considerably brighter than Skankala. Not sayin her semi-blackness and support flowing from that will not make her competitive against Warren- but it will not be slam dunk.
She is quick in the mouth (no reference to Willie intended) but not so quick in the brain. That causes her to have to stuff some major positions back into her mouth when in spontaneous situations.
One example was where she flat out said she supported voting for felons who were still in prison or had not finished their sentencing requirements. Boom. A fuck-up. Next day, a full retreat.
Another example is when she flat out supported medicare for all for illegals in the debate- Boom. A fuck-up. Next day, full frigging reversal and retreat.
As I said, she is quick but she is sloppy. That may be the way Willie likes it but not so much for others.
