Logarithmic Spirals

Yup, big danger, after the fact calls, after the fact indicators, plethora of lines where per chance one or two randomly hit target.
That's why shotguns are great weapons in short range shooting, you only need the couple of pellets to hit target.
%%
Exactly;
12 gauge , 1.25 oz lead has 731 pellets.5 shot capacity.3,500 hits:D:DAmazing firepower.
 
I would question based on those charts posted, what does it look like when the spiral is not working?
I imagine if you add a random number into the equation it will also look like it is working because working is based on a visual test and not working is left completely open ended.
%%
Good point ,copper may not trend that spiral smooth very much /LOL:D:D
HoweVer copper circles/ after a study on his copper circles;
that pattern maybe very effective in copper circles, copper coins, pennies half pennies,brass silver, gold,
combo copper -nickel. May not work so sell in buckskins, beaverskins, wampum, tobacco ; all the above has been money 1600-1787-1887...... NO disrespect to the Federal reserve:caution::caution:
Local metals dealer does lot more business in tin, copper brass than gold,so volume may play a factor, more than any spirals.
Copper is usually sold by pound/pounds;
strange they have minted [circle]pennies + circle half pennies + circle pennies the size of quarters+ half dollars.
 
Was messing around a little with TradingView's Fib circle tool and came up with this:-

! Vortex SPX.png


Used two swing highs and swing low in between to project next swing low. Notice it also had resistance @ 161.8% after short-term bounce before making new swing low @ 261.8%.
 
Last edited:
(SEMAFOR)

A wee bit of a stretch from this topic but thought what the hell, thought where else am I gonna put it ....


‘Impossible to explain’ math proof


Wikimedia Commons

Mathematicians proved a decades-old conjecture that two major areas of math were profoundly linked, and apparently it’s very important.


The 1967 “Langlands conjecture” proposed that number theory and harmonic analysis are interchangeable. If true, it would amount to a “grand unified theory” of math. A new 1,000-page proof shows it to be true, or so we are informed: The concept is so complex that it is “impossible to explain the significance … to non-mathematicians,” one mathematician told New Scientist. Often, in science, showing that two theories are symmetrical — such as electricity and magnetism — leads to breakthroughs. Perhaps that will happen here, or perhaps it is just a beautiful thing, opaque to those of us without the skills to see it.
 
(SEMAFOR)

A wee bit of a stretch from this topic but thought what the hell, thought where else am I gonna put it ....


‘Impossible to explain’ math proof


Wikimedia Commons

Mathematicians proved a decades-old conjecture that two major areas of math were profoundly linked, and apparently it’s very important.


The 1967 “Langlands conjecture” proposed that number theory and harmonic analysis are interchangeable. If true, it would amount to a “grand unified theory” of math. A new 1,000-page proof shows it to be true, or so we are informed: The concept is so complex that it is “impossible to explain the significance … to non-mathematicians,” one mathematician told New Scientist. Often, in science, showing that two theories are symmetrical — such as electricity and magnetism — leads to breakthroughs. Perhaps that will happen here, or perhaps it is just a beautiful thing, opaque to those of us without the skills to see it.

Cool, I'll tune into either my current fav math YT channels numberphile or mathologer for layman's explanations


Unless you want to go with the entertaining JRE's recent podcast of Terrence Howard's '1 x 1 = 2'
 
Back
Top