Perhaps some of the more experienced option trades could answer the following:
I still do not understand how LJM could lose so much in Feb 2018, when it survived
Aug 2015, Summer 2011, Oct 2008, etc.? Not only did it survive these previous events, the fund's returns all for those years was positive.
It does not make sense that a fund that targets 8%-12% (around the market average) would ever need to take on so much risk that it would face a blow up (ie. -80%)
Which of the following describes what happened at LJM?
1. Due to the low VIX environment, LJM started selling options closer ATM with more risk to earn the same return it had been with OTM options when the VIX was higher.
2. Their strategy had not changed from previous years and the Feb 2018 volatility event (largest daily VIX spike) was so unique that their existing hedging (long calls) could not protect the fund.
As I said, it simply does not make sense that a fund targeting the market average would ever face a blow up.
JTunner
I still do not understand how LJM could lose so much in Feb 2018, when it survived
Aug 2015, Summer 2011, Oct 2008, etc.? Not only did it survive these previous events, the fund's returns all for those years was positive.
It does not make sense that a fund that targets 8%-12% (around the market average) would ever need to take on so much risk that it would face a blow up (ie. -80%)
Which of the following describes what happened at LJM?
1. Due to the low VIX environment, LJM started selling options closer ATM with more risk to earn the same return it had been with OTM options when the VIX was higher.
2. Their strategy had not changed from previous years and the Feb 2018 volatility event (largest daily VIX spike) was so unique that their existing hedging (long calls) could not protect the fund.
As I said, it simply does not make sense that a fund targeting the market average would ever face a blow up.
JTunner