...BTW, this whole thing started based on someone who said you needed a U.S. passport for "protection" and me arguing that a lot of other passports would provide more "protection" then a U.S. one...
That was me, my bad for starting a tangent. My comment was predicated on the idea of someone renouncing their US citizenship and moving elsewhere so as to be able to avoid paying U.S. taxes. That linked into the idea of being an American expatriate living in another country without consular protection in the event of an ISIS terror attack in their new home country.
Let's face the facts here...
Since 9/11, there have been no successful attacks in the US with a foreign terror group claiming responsibility. Most were simply "jihadist-inspired" attempts, but not carried out by the group themselves. There were I couple I recall that were said to be sponsored attacks, but those attempts failed. (Times Square in NYC some years ago maybe? Cannot remember).
So the USA still does provide a good level of protection for it's home-based citizens against terror, whereas in another country they may not have that level of safety. That is all I was getting at.
