Quote from Scientist:
You should read your own stuff twice and make sure you can back it up well before you post it.
In fact, you aren't telling me anything. Other than what I can read between your lines: What you're really meaning to say is:
"If I, as a supposedly superiorly intelligent individual of this profession do not / can not make the effort to comprehend theories xyz by this person and therefore they, as well as all of his other theories are not partially, but entirely invalid. I refuse any further openness to his theories or the possibility of one or multiple of his theories / concepts being valid or useful. Since this is a lot more convenient than making an actual effort to understand, not to mention a lot less controversial, I prefer and choose the path of ignorance."
It's a paradigm thing. Have a good read of Stephen R. Covey's book "The 7 Habits of Highly effective people", then read the sequels. Also, make sure you take an accredited NLP-course and read some really good books on the subject. Jack has gone into a lot of NLP, in fact when you go through the new matrix documents (to be downloaded in the now very active MSN community, by the way), you will find some systematic NLP approaches to applying the theories. It isn't just a thing you can look at for a day and do a judgment. It's a holistic approach. You either get it or you don't. If you do, it'll take a while. Becoming an airline pilot isn't learnt within days or weeks. Applying Jack's methods takes work. Many people don't get that bit. They go : "Oh, that doesn't work, because Stochastics is a crap indicator, anyway." They have no idea. If you use 1 indicator and get to know all of it's nuances, you can do amazing stuff with it. If you don't, you're better off trading without indicators altogether. Indicators that are only 90% understood by themselves are dangerous! Yes, Jack will ask you to put work in. He requires you to know and understand the formula behind Stochastics, he says it's crucial and he's right. Yes, he'll require you to do 1 page or more of stop-logs per day, flaw cards till the cows come home. Most people stop here, because they think this is too much work. Then they blame him and say it's nonsense! Well, if you do, then please go, but don't discredit people who have more brain / commitment than you to actually understand.
One of Covey's 7 habits that he stresses most:
"First, seek to understand ... Then to be understood."
Think about it.
You don't even know what you're talking about. It's not the same as channeling stocks.
Regarding trader vs trader - Well, it seems you're talking about equities markets here. Yes, there are real buyers and sellers in the equities markets. There are win-win situations, too. In the futures markets that isn't the case. There's no win-win in the futures markets, never. It's zero-sum for starters. There are a lot less "real buyers" and "real sellers" - Trust me. Most people in the mini's at least are day traders. They get in and get out as soon as the wind turns. It really is quite a lot of a "trader vs trader" situation! That's what futures markets are about. This is what Hershey talks about all along in his futures trading theories. He never talk about day trading stocks, so what's your point?
His stock swing trading approach is apparently a lot like CANSLIM - I'm not sure - I haven't actually studied it much since I day trade futures. However, it seems well profitable, P&L statements of members using the latest swing calls have been published in excel format on Jack's current MSN forum.
I believe Jack's MSN forum, which has always been his base, now has over 100 members, the group can be found at: http://groups.msn.com/JackHersheysStrategies/messages.msnw
Well, personally, I just don't mind studying things with an open mind until I can squeeze no more knowledge out of it - as you probably know. My handle sort of suggests it, too. There's always SOMETHING to be learnt out of ANYTHING. And be it only to KNOW what's wrong and what's not. I'll still KNOW more, won't I? If I find Jack / his dog / his entire life / some of his strategies or methods to be bogus - fine. Who cares? Maybe he's 99% bogus. Who cares? Well, in the meantime I'll get whatever I can out of that other 1%. It'll be well worth it. Knowledge is power.
As for you Mecro - stop being a troll and start growing up. It's not just your opinion that counts. Take it or leave it.
~Scientist
Quote from Grob109:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would guess (poorly, probably) that you have capital and you place it as you describe. If the capital sits through this thing you recommend, then it is not efficient in it's application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not entirely correct. The point is that capital does not sit through a thing, particularly not a large drawdown. In order to do that, I want to enter the peak of a retracement or discount, which in fact maximizes both profit cycle and time-in-trade.
I wasn't completely clear.
As any day goes by, your have capital at stake.
If you sideline (period A) on the retrace (not have capital being drawn down). Then if you go in on the discounted condition and make money from that point on (period B). This gives you a money velocity quotient where profits of B are divided by sum of time A plus B. The opportunity cost you pay in A is worth considering and further recovering.
You and girlpower do know and explain how to do this. You trade the retrace from retail into the discount status and reverse at time A go to B.
The truism that always applies is: if you can regognize something; then you can solve it. The only things you cannot solve are those you can't recognize.
As a brief OT, look at the red sock scenario.
It must be a cheap and not color fast sock. Who buys those? If a person does, how does he handle maintaining their utility. He must deal with the consequence of buying such by doing what is required and additionally also being sure to not further jepordize other dear things. All dear things must be protected.
This guy has a dilemma on his hands. mecro is different, he is immobilized and cannot operate at all as you point out. The red sock person is in a place where he knows there is something that has to be dealt with and it also is affecting other dear things he has to process. He bought into the red sock he sees. It is his sock or maybe people put socks in his water. not likely.
What a lousy challenge to have to postpone dealng with. There are a lot of people here who are postponing things. You can see it all over the place here.
What is it like to discover, through personal assessment, that everything is not quite shipshape. mecro is not in that situation. He is in a state of bliss as the saying goes. No challenge for him to ruminate about.
If you take the ET genre as epitomised by quantity and power, everything is SOP and no one is hanging lights in a bell tower. But on the otherhand occasionally someone gets spooked. Being spooked over and over for a while can get sort of disconcerting. Entrenching is normal. Repeatedly entrenching is energy consuming. It is important to observe this. As consciousness raising gets to a point where the status quo notices it, then others will profit more and more by being able to give consideration to the pertibations.
Orchards are maintained by just blowing the stumps out. Getting rid of trees in the landscape depends upon how big they are. The stately older ones are taken out by the roots. You have to go all around the tree to cut the roots that have failed to give sustenance to the trees. Chestnuts in the mid Atlantic states went that route. In New England, the Dutch elm went away. Today the gypsy moth makes inroads on many varieties of oaks in waves over the years.
I wonder what is bugging some of the people here so much? Wake up calls it looks like.
Have a good one.
Quote from lescor:
The number one rule that governs my trading is that I absolutely do not know what will happen next. I can have hunches and figure probabilities and put money on them. But I never allow myself to think I KNOW what will happen. This makes taking losses pretty easy.
Who says the methods are "mysterious" - You?Quote from Mecro:
Ok point taken.
To be honest I did not think I needed to explain my comment about Jack Hershey since all of the criticism has already been said by about 80% of Elite. I have read ALL of his threads and IMO, there is very little to add to Jack Hershey's credibility, if any, let alone his mysterious method.
Thanks for being cynical. You're accusing me of saying I turn scalps into swing-positions?I've taken good note of your earlier posts in this thread and have applied it to my trading. I've been turning some scalping trades into swing positions and I've been getting good results. It takes time and practice but it makes a lot of sense.
Quote from Scientist:
Who says the methods are "mysterious" - You?
There are people who don't. It tells me something about you (the methods are "mysterious" to you), but nothing about him, do you realize that? I hope you do.
Thanks for being cynical. You're accusing me of saying I turn scalps into swing-positions?
Unfortunately, that is inaccurate and I have never said anything like that.
And fractal-based trading has nothing to do with that, it's about having separate trades in multiple different timeframes at a time, not about having one trade in separate timeframes ! You've mixed things up.
Get a grip on the reality of it. Don't turn things around. I appreciate your consideration, Mecro.
Scientist.
OK Mecro, I'm sorry I misinterpreted you - On the internet, intent isn't always clear due to lack of intonation and body language.Quote from Mecro:
Ok I'm sorry I even tried to compliment what you have posted cause I did not know you were gonna take offense to it.
I said that I (meaning me, myself and I) not you or anybody else has been turning scalping trades into swing trades. To be a little more clear, I'm not being shaken out and staying as part of the minority in the right direction. I've been reading the tape for the shake outs because of what you said.
If you want more discussion just PM me
Now come on let's face it - If you didn't know who wrote this and what he had in mind, would you be able to interpret this as blunt cynicism or am I just paranoid?"I've taken good note of your earlier posts in this thread and have applied it to my trading. I've been turning some scalping trades into swing positions and I've been getting good results. It takes time and practice but it makes a lot of sense."
