Is it this simple: liquidity takers are gamblers playing against odds, liquidity providers have odds in their favor? I reason that the market does not give a rat's asss who makes money, but the market always needs liquidity and pays premium to those willing to provide it. So, liquidity providers are on the same side as the market. This leaves liquidity takers to play with odds stuck up against them.
Please feel free to pound me
Please feel free to pound me
