This is exactly why I am sad your passion does not match your design skills. You can write a TON of code, and with the right guidance, you would be incredible.
please share your 2 cents
This is exactly why I am sad your passion does not match your design skills. You can write a TON of code, and with the right guidance, you would be incredible.
sorry for typosThis is exactly why I am sad your passion does not match your design skills. You can write a TON of code, and with the right guidance, you would be incredible.
why don't you recode the sortedQueue differently. Please how would you do the syntax?I guess it's only fair that I've criticized you so long that I try and help. OK, so here is the best way I can put it: you make things too complex. Too complex.
There is a famous saying (paraphrasing): perfection is not achieved when there is nothing to add, but when there is nothing to take away.
That is the best piece of advice I can give you based on the code I've seen.
That’s where I think I fail most of the time. I look at good code, most things are wicked short and concise. My code is a mess of loops, ifs and cases. Is that a design failure or coding style failure?That is the best piece of advice I can give you based on the code I've seen.
I wouldn't have a `sortedQueue` to begin with.
//# https://twitter.com/LinkersX
xTwitter tweet1;
xString text1;
tweet1.username("LinkersX");
tweet1.password("123456789");
text1("x->hello twitter!");
//tweet text1 and replay1 object as replaying HTML5 chart!!!!
tweet1.tweet(text1, replay1);
I wouldn't have a `sortedQueue` to begin with.
That’s where I think I fail most of the time. I look at good code, most things are wicked short and concise. My code is a mess of loops, ifs and cases. Is that a design failure or coding style failure?
PS. There is a whole template game that true UHF people play to reduce WtW latency, would be interesting to get your take on it
Absolutely no copying whatsoever in sort xSort Object no actual data being pushed into the xQueue
I'm gonna give you shocking result of benchmark done on offset_ptr<>; compared to Linkers::X containers