Likes

The most annoying thing is when you tell everyone something profound that will make them a fortune and you get no likes.
Ain't that the truth! Reason being that if it involves work and study, nobody's interested.
 
Recommend requiring posters to have 1000 postings before being able to like. This would cut down on the extra aliases that folks use/crate to like their own postings.
Alternatively, posters could be limited to just a couple of likes a day and likes would be spent theoretically on better postings.
 
The system is asymmetrical because you can't give a "dislike" to a message. Makes it more difficult to judge whether a post is helpful or only popular in the eyes of the buddies of the poster.
 
The system is asymmetrical because you can't give a "dislike" to a message. Makes it more difficult to judge whether a post is helpful or only popular in the eyes of the buddies of the poster.
Correct, thus if you only had a couple of likes to hand out daily (non-cumulative), it would make people more careful with what they like. There is no premium on likes right now. They are like water.
 
Correct, thus if you only had a couple of likes to hand out daily (non-cumulative), it would make people more careful with what they like. There is no premium on likes right now. They are like water.
I understand that your intention is to make people more careful and selective in when to hand out their scarce likes. However, I meant my comment slightly different. A messages could be posted where a few members like it, and it would show at that message. But to an awful lot of other members this message could be complete cr@p and they can't assign this "dislike" to that message. Net result: it appears that the message is a helpful message. This is the asymmetry I was hinting at.
 
I understand that your intention is to make people more careful and selective in when to hand out their scarce likes. However, I meant my comment slightly different. A messages could be posted where a few members like it, and it would show at that message. But to an awful lot of other members this message could be complete cr@p and they can't assign this "dislike" to that message. Net result: it appears that the message is a helpful message. This is the asymmetry I was hinting at.
While I understand your point, I think having dislikes would foster negativity on a largely positive site.
 
I suspect Baron would have metrics on this kind of thing and it may be that "dislikes" inhibit number of posts which would certainly not benefit ET.
 
Back
Top