‘Like a Terror Movie’: How Climate Change Will Cause More Simultaneous Disasters

[futurecurrents]

Global Warming!! F%&k, time to run in circles with my hair on fire screaming "wake up and pee, the world is on fire!!"

Essentially I can't stand the left: they don't like our carbon footprint [our prosperity] but they don't let us manage forests. The left destroys everything it touches and never intersects with any useful reality. If they can't be bought off then they have to be fought off. It's either that or let their insanity engulf you. Democrats claim the intellectual high ground is theirs but essentially they are mindless trash that get all their ideas from the U.N. The U.N. wants us all living in population centers with socialized medicine: they want to be able to observe us, control us and deny us medical care if we are dissenters. In California they fight real hard against practical forest management because if the forests burn people are forced out and move into the cities. The left are like psychopaths; the plans are very simple but the obfuscation is clever and unending.

I agree. We hate prosperity and things. All our ideas are from the UN. ( I have to see what they are saying today). Yes we want all of humanity in the cities so we can watch them and our plans are simple but obfuscated and clever. And they don't end. We can't be bought off so we have to be fought off. And they don't end.

So you should set your hair on fire and run around in circles if you are not doing that already.


Only kidding, please do not set your hair or anything else on fire.

 

[wildchild]

No I don't. Not a bit. You do

If you really spoke your mind, you'd be speechless.

You still failed to answer the question about inference! Why is that?

 

[WeToddDid2]

Yes, I hail from Borneo and I want a new refrigerator.

Looks like they are still a little upset about your only solution. Don't these people know they need to pay signigicantly high prices for CO2 based fuel to save the planet? These assholes. don't they know that paying taxes to hopefully reduce carbon carbon emissions on day are more important than eating. They should be in the streets begging to pay a 10 multiple of the proposed news taxes.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ce-Paris-riot-police-use-tear-gas-batons.html

 

[futurecurrents]

You still failed to answer the question about inference! Why is that?

Because I have no idea what you are talking about. I usually put up 1000 year charts like the following that clearly show man made global warming.

First, the connection between the rise in carbon emissions and the rise in CO2 concentration is not an assumption but a fact. We know that burning fossil fuels—the remains of ancient plants—creates CO2. Carbon isotope ratios show that the CO2 added to the atmosphere has come from ancient plants. Emissions from fossil fuel combustion are the only source of ancient plant carbon in the volume required.

Second, the connection between the rise in CO2 concentration and the rise in global temperature (the greenhouse effect) is also a fact. A number of studies have shown the greenhouse effect operating as expected. Earlier this year scientists directly measured the increase in CO2 and matched it with the temperature increase, catching the greenhouse effect in midstream. Moreover, no process other than greenhouse warming can explain the rise in global temperature. The Sun cannot be the cause, for while temperatures have risen the Sun’s output has barely varied.

Today we often hear people say that they accept that global temperature is rising, but not that humans are responsible. But as the two facts above show, humans are responsible.

 

[maxpi]

Come the revolution we will all drive Mercedes!!

 

[wildchild]

Because I have no idea what you are talking about. I usually put up 1000 year charts like the following that clearly show man made global warming.

First, the connection between the rise in carbon emissions and the rise in CO2 concentration is not an assumption but a fact. We know that burning fossil fuels—the remains of ancient plants—creates CO2. Carbon isotope ratios show that the CO2 added to the atmosphere has come from ancient plants. Emissions from fossil fuel combustion are the only source of ancient plant carbon in the volume required.

Second, the connection between the rise in CO2 concentration and the rise in global temperature (the greenhouse effect) is also a fact. A number of studies have shown the greenhouse effect operating as expected. Earlier this year scientists directly measured the increase in CO2 and matched it with the temperature increase, catching the greenhouse effect in midstream. Moreover, no process other than greenhouse warming can explain the rise in global temperature. The Sun cannot be the cause, for while temperatures have risen the Sun’s output has barely varied.

Today we often hear people say that they accept that global temperature is rising, but not that humans are responsible. But as the two facts above show, humans are responsible.

First off, butt clown, you never post 1000 year charts. Second of all, the connection between CO2 has been shown to lag temp. Third of all, if you were in the least bit scientific at all, you would know that the climate apocalypse that the hoaxsters are predicting cannot occur based on CO2 emission alone. We can burn every last bit of fossil fuels and not see the raise in the temp they are predicting. CO2 is considered a greenhouse gas, but by all measures it is a rather weak one at best. Even most of the hoaxsters acknowledge this FACT. It is not up for debate, it is proven. They reach their overblown predictions by trying to figure out how the feedback loops will impact future climate. Of course the hoaxsters claim the overall feedback is positive and the climate approaches an asymptote. The past does not seem to paint such a picture as the feedbacks have tended to be negative which has given the relatively stable climate the Earth has experienced over the last billion or so years. Major events have occurred and the climate system has responded to these impulses and tended towards stability. Since you always seem to focus on CO2 and CO2 only, it shows me you have very little idea what you are talking about.

The hoaxsters have lied and I have not forgotten their email scandal where they were exposed.

 

[TJustice]

You lefties just lie and make stuff up.

Why would anyone care about the like to posts ratio on this board. Is there a stat kept for that somewhere? Does anyone check it?

As far as someone's previous comment... why would anyone care if two or there of the pre commies here put him or her on ignore. Being ignored by the new commies is a good thing. This board was far better when there were fewer lefties and the ones who were here typically offered content not DNC talking points.

Holy shit jerm, you are actually trying to run with the lie. And you wonder why I call you a lying sack of shit.

The real reason is that the likes to posts ratio for posters that started before the like system was put in place is not favorable, so you changed your name. You should have changed it to "lyingsackof shit"

 

[futurecurrents]

First off, butt clown, you never post 1000 year charts. Second of all, the connection between CO2 has been shown to lag temp. Third of all, if you were in the least bit scientific at all, you would know that the climate apocalypse that the hoaxsters are predicting cannot occur based on CO2 emission alone. We can burn every last bit of fossil fuels and not see the raise in the temp they are predicting. CO2 is considered a greenhouse gas, but by all measures it is a rather weak one at best. Even most of the hoaxsters acknowledge this FACT. It is not up for debate, it is proven. They reach their overblown predictions by trying to figure out how the feedback loops will impact future climate. Of course the hoaxsters claim the overall feedback is positive and the climate approaches an asymptote. The past does not seem to paint such a picture as the feedbacks have tended to be negative which has given the relatively stable climate the Earth has experienced over the last billion or so years. Major events have occurred and the climate system has responded to these impulses and tended towards stability. Since you always seem to focus on CO2 and CO2 only, it shows me you have very little idea what you are talking about.

The hoaxsters have lied and I have not forgotten their email scandal where they were exposed.

First off, butt clown, you never post 1000 year charts. wrong, I post that last chart too much according to some here.

Second of all, the connection between CO2 has been shown to lag temp. partial credit as it can do both, but in intent of what you said.....wrong

Third of all, if you were in the least bit scientific at all, you would know that the climate apocalypse that the hoaxsters are predicting cannot occur based on CO2 emission alone. wrong

We can burn every last bit of fossil fuels and not see the raise in the temp they are predicting. wrong

CO2 is considered a greenhouse gas, but by all measures it is a rather weak one at best. wrong

Even most of the hoaxsters acknowledge this FACT. (if you mean climate scientists, again wrong.

It is not up for debate, it is proven. wrong

Since you always seem to focus on CO2 and CO2 only, it shows me you have very little idea what you are talking about. I do tend to talk about CO2 because it is the most important but I have very good idea what I am talking as I have a degree in env sci and have closely followed this subject for forty years. So finally........wrong.


In short it would be difficult for you to be more wrong in nearly everything you wrote.

 

[wildchild]

First off, butt clown, you never post 1000 year charts. wrong, I post that last chart too much according to some here.

Second of all, the connection between CO2 has been shown to lag temp. partial credit as it can do both, but in intent of what you said.....wrong

Third of all, if you were in the least bit scientific at all, you would know that the climate apocalypse that the hoaxsters are predicting cannot occur based on CO2 emission alone. wrong

We can burn every last bit of fossil fuels and not see the raise in the temp they are predicting. wrong

CO2 is considered a greenhouse gas, but by all measures it is a rather weak one at best. wrong

Even most of the hoaxsters acknowledge this FACT. (if you mean climate scientists, again wrong.

It is not up for debate, it is proven. wrong

Since you always seem to focus on CO2 and CO2 only, it shows me you have very little idea what you are talking about. I do tend to talk about CO2 because it is the most important but I have very good idea what I am talking as I have a degree in env sci and have closely followed this subject for forty years. So finally........wrong.


In short it would be difficult for you to be more wrong in nearly everything you wrote.

Where to begin? Is it your plan you bombard me with some much bullshit I can't respond to it all? All the stuff you claimed are wrong, are correct to the T. It is clear you have on idea what you are talking about.

People like me deal with science, people like you deal with consensus. If you do not realize that consensus does not fit into the scientific method, then how can I discuss science with you.

The fact of the matter is people like you are not concerned with science because solving global warming is not your goal. The plan behind the global warming hoax is to implement high carbon based taxes on the wealthy that will be used to subsidize the poor downtrodden saps like yourself. You are not even so much worried about the funds that will come your way, you are more concerned in tearing down those who are more successful than yourself. The best thing you could do is stop worrying about how much other people have, figure out a way to get an income source on your own, and keep your greasy fucking fingers out of my wallet.

 

[TJustice]

Fact.. Temperature change change leads co2 levels in the historical record.
This is just what the ice core data shows on a historical basis and it is also what the modern temperature record shows in the paper by Ole Humlum you have seen multiple times using the same temperature data sets the nutters use.

Speculation... CO2 amplifies warming when coming out of an ice age. ( I think this speculation may turn out to be correct.)

Further speculation... Man made co2 is causing warming now. (If this were every to be correct it would most likely to be an insignificant forcing. Water Vapor clouds, Sun, tides, aerosols and other forcing are likely to have a much greater impact.

First off, butt clown, you never post 1000 year charts. wrong, I post that last chart too much according to some here.

Second of all, the connection between CO2 has been shown to lag temp. partial credit as it can do both, but in intent of what you said.....wrong

Third of all, if you were in the least bit scientific at all, you would know that the climate apocalypse that the hoaxsters are predicting cannot occur based on CO2 emission alone. wrong

We can burn every last bit of fossil fuels and not see the raise in the temp they are predicting. wrong

CO2 is considered a greenhouse gas, but by all measures it is a rather weak one at best. wrong

Even most of the hoaxsters acknowledge this FACT. (if you mean climate scientists, again wrong.

It is not up for debate, it is proven. wrong

Since you always seem to focus on CO2 and CO2 only, it shows me you have very little idea what you are talking about. I do tend to talk about CO2 because it is the most important but I have very good idea what I am talking as I have a degree in env sci and have closely followed this subject for forty years. So finally........wrong.


In short it would be difficult for you to be more wrong in nearly everything you wrote.