What the lefties don't see coming though is that these unions have taken on a life of their own. All the "progressives" are thinking their city councils are just going to eliminate their police departments. Heh, good luck wit dat. It's the other way round they have "rights" and contracts and they will turn on their city bigtime. They are the ones who will give the city a little taste of what no police will look like by going on strike for a few weeks right in the middle of the summer and let you see how that works out for ya.
Not to detract from your point but what they're doing is likely just cutting back slush funds. They're not defunding anyone and it's all a bid to get votes. Perhaps we should hope the police strike. This may be the impetus needed to clean out the entire force and bring in new faces that want to change things. No union contracts and far more accountability. Martial law would be almost sure if the police started striking. Don't construe this as me supporting martial law, but do understand what I'm saying is that the police striking could be the impetus for actual change.
To your greater point I tend to agree at least in part. Democratic senators have often been the most likely to increase police power. Republicans sort of wax and wane on the subject. "Blue lives matter" is more of a rallying cry of right leaning people me too'ing the blacks lives matter movement. However the overall problem transcends party lines. Both Republicans and Democrats really don't have any problem giving the police more power than they deserve. Every president regardless of party seems to allow more unconstitutional power grabs by state and federal law enforcement. However in recent history Kamala Harris, a person responsible for locking up an innumerable amount of black men, has suddenly changed her stance - ostensibly to collect votes and perhaps a shot at VP. Time will tell if Black Lives Matter remembers how little black lives did matter to Kamala Harris not more than a decade ago.
