Libs Freak Out Over "Straight White Guy Festival"

You can keep repeating it all you want. But the democratic party is supposed to be the party of tolerance. That means other people's views, even if they run contrary, are supposed to be accepted, even if they are not condoned. You can bring up Rush or other republicans, but the Republican party isn't known as the party of tolerance.

That's the hypocrisy.



And the Democratic Party IS the more tolerant party. You have no valid point. Your perception is twisted as evidenced by your bringing up the writing of one guy to supposedly represent the left as a whole.


What the hell are you babbling about?
 
You can keep repeating it all you want. But the democratic party is supposed to be the party of tolerance. That means other people's views, even if they run contrary, are supposed to be accepted, even if they are not condoned. You can bring up Rush or other republicans, but the Republican party isn't known as the party of tolerance.

That's the hypocrisy.
That's hilarious. The party of racism, sexism and classism is trying to tell the party opposed to those things what tolerance means. Nice try but FAIL!
 
And the Democratic Party IS the more tolerant party. You have no valid point. Your perception is twisted as evidenced by your bringing up the writing of one guy to supposedly represent the left as a whole.


What the hell are you babbling about?
Typical rightbot nonsense. He wants to distort the meaning of a well-known word to the point where it becomes meaningless. Nobody with a lick of sense thinks tolerance means accepting intolerance. They have become the party of no shame. If they had any, they would stop all their bullshitting.
 
And the Democratic Party IS the more tolerant party. You have no valid point. Your perception is twisted as evidenced by your bringing up the writing of one guy to supposedly represent the left as a whole.


What the hell are you babbling about?

Wow, you sure convinced me with all those facts!
 
Typical rightbot nonsense. He wants to distort the meaning of a well-known word to the point where it becomes meaningless. Nobody with a lick of sense thinks tolerance means accepting intolerance. They have become the party of no shame. If they had any, they would stop the bullshit.

"America is advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad, 'cause it's gonna put up a fight. It's gonna say "You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours."

-The American President
 
"America is advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad, 'cause it's gonna put up a fight. It's gonna say "You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours."

-The American President
Amazing how you keep missing the point. Letting that man speak his mind doesn't mean squelching your own freedom of speech to oppose his views. Just as he has the right to speak, so do you.

Wtf! Is this like rocket science for you? I certainly don't see you tolerating any viewpoints you're opposed to. Person1 says X. Person2 says Not X. And the argument continues. As long as nobody tries to impose some authority to silence the other, that's how it's supposed to go.

I tolerate your right to speak. That doesn't mean I have to suffer in silence while you spout intolerable ideas. I certainly don't see you suffering in silence.

This is really elementary stuff:

Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from criticism.

Only the willfully ignorant doesn't get this.
 
Amazing how you keep missing the point. Letting that man speak his mind doesn't mean squelching your own freedom of speech to oppose his views. Just as he has the right to speak, so do you.

No, I get that just fine. It's when people start calling for the firing of individuals from shows, or the closing/banning of businesses, etc. That's when it goes beyond "tolerance" because it is impactful - as you said earlier when you said "as long as it doesn't violate somebody's rights". You keep missing that aspect.
 
nice evasion...

I will spell it out for you..

1. your party is so intolerant of free speech and ideas it used the IRS to crush conservatives and those who had pro Isreali sounding names.
being that you are a leftist pre fascist democrat loving drone... it is odd you would lecture anybody on constitutional rights.
Look what the FBI did to phil mickelson and even prosecuted dinesh dsouza. That is amazing. don't you think. what if the right was doing that to you? do you not see how out of control that is?

2. The republican party was the party, the party of lincoln was also the party that pushed through women's rights to vote and the 1960s civil rights laws. The democrats are pro whatever group can get them votes... but just like what you do they rip on Christians and they try to pretend they are the party of smart people. So smart they figured out how to have districts that vote 100 percent for Obama.

In short almost nothing you write is anchored reality... you just drone out the leftist meme b.s. and all.

with respect to climate change... moron...
while only a lying as paid whore lefist would try and say the sun and the tides are not responsible for some of the earths warming and cooling... I will give you a chance to redeem your ignorant moron self.

Show us some science showing man made co2 causes warming.
If you wish to unjack this thread like you just did... you can post you science to the co2 also causes cooling thread.





What a ham-handed attempt at threadjacking/changing the subject. :D You're the most pathetic rightbot here. No wonder you're totally clueless on climate change. (See? I can change the subject too! :p)
 
No, I get that just fine. It's when people start calling for the firing of individuals from shows, or the closing/banning of businesses, etc. That's when it goes beyond "tolerance" because it is impactful - as you said earlier when you said "as long as it doesn't violate somebody's rights". You keep missing that aspect.
If Hobby Lobby doesn't want to be boycotted, maybe they shouldn't insist on controlling the birth-control choices of their female employees. If the sponsors of Rush Limbaugh don't want to be boycotted, maybe they should stop supporting some gasbag spouting hate speech. The First Amendment says people can't be jailed for their speech (within bounds; no freedom is completely unlimited). Nowhere does it say private citizens have to suffer hateful ideas in silence.

Btw freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to a microphone and public airwaves. If Rush et al get fired from their talking head jobs, they still have freedom of speech: blogs, books, etc. Most of them are doing that already. Glenn Beck got fired from Fox for saying something unacceptable but he didn't go to jail, he went to the internet.

Again, only the willfully ignorant don't get this.
 
Back
Top