Libs, all this talk about DC statehood is bullfeathers.

[TreeFrogTrader]

It is just a scam, as we know, to get two more dem senators.

But all the libs are chugging away to eventually get there.

But constitutionally it is bullshit.

The Constitution lays out the various requirements for a territory or whatever to become a state BUT-BUT-BUT the District of Columbia -or at least "the seat of government" (they could have chosen some other area)- is specifically created by specific language in the Constitution. You would have to also amend that part of the Constitution to eliminate that language before making it a state, or else move the seat of government somewhere else. The constitution specifically says "it shall be separate from the particular states."

It's all bullshit. Lay off the weed for crisesake. Approving a new area or territory as a state does not erase that clause. Approving a new state is not an amendment to the constitution, it is the following of the constitution and the process described therein.

Oh I see, you libs want to argue that no one pays any attention to the constitution anymore so that is not necessarily a problem to achieving that goal. Well, that might be true. And Ketanji Jackson, Che Guevera's sister on the Supreme Court would help you out when the case gets there.

 

[smallfil]

It is just a scam, as we know, to get two more dem senators.

But all the libs are chugging away to eventually get there.

But constitutionally it is bullshit.

The Constitution lays out the various requirements for a territory or whatever to become a state BUT-BUT-BUT the District of Columbia -or at least "the seat of government" (they could have chosen some other area)- is specifically created by specific language in the Constitution. You would have to also amend that part of the Constitution to eliminate that language before making it a state, or else move the seat of government somewhere else. The constitution specifically says "it shall be separate from the particular states."

It's all bullshit. Lay off the weed for crisesake. Approving a new area or territory as a state does not erase that clause. Approving a new state is not an amendment to the constitution, it is the following of the constitution and the process described therein.

Oh I see, you libs want to argue that no one pays any attention to the constitution anymore so that is not necessarily a problem to achieving that goal. Well, that might be true. And Ketanji Jackson, Che Guevera's sister on the Supreme Court would help you out when the case gets there.

These are the same Democrats who see no problem of non-US citizens voting in US elections. Some RINOs will probably, go along with that because they have normalized widespread election fraud. Never mind the fact that the Republicans are getting the short end of the stick. Even now, these RINOs should be focusing on reducing widespread election fraud with election for US President is next year but, no. They are focused on giving Ukraine a blank check from which they will get their cut, somehow. McConnell and Graham are disgusting as hell.