in psychology what you wrote is called projection.
typically I prove that you are it wrong.. like I did on this thread or when we argue about tax cuts. I cite to economics sites show that tax cuts were followed by revenue increase and then you start introducing bullshit via articles looking to models or percent of gdp indicators. you don't understand economics at all. you are after all a typical low info internet lefty.
typical lefties are the reptiles who play fast and loose with the truth to further their agenda.
I deal in facts and argue from the facts.
however in this case - my hypothetical proved you were wrong.
if you would like to go over it again... I can.
I wonder how you can continue to be so stupid on this subject. Ricter gave up the fight quickly. He does that when he knows he was mistaken.
I don't get how stupid you are on this issue. I don't even understand how ignorant you are on this topic?
Are you really still trying to argue that having a stronger currency causes a negative trade imbalance. America had a very strong currency at times and had trade surpluses with it.
In the last few decades our dollar has devalued and we have a trade deficit. You think we can just devalue our way to a trade surplus? That is a really non systematic way to think and its ignorant of how the economy works.
It may lead to a few more exports but we will also be paying more for imports. In the short run devaluing could be a positive or a negative. It depends on how much and the quality of goods you exporting vs the ones you are importing and the elasticity of the demand for those goods.
But in the long run... Stronger economies making complex desirable goods like cars tractors, airplanes, medical tech and other tech is the way to trade surplus and a strong currency.
typically I prove that you are it wrong.. like I did on this thread or when we argue about tax cuts. I cite to economics sites show that tax cuts were followed by revenue increase and then you start introducing bullshit via articles looking to models or percent of gdp indicators. you don't understand economics at all. you are after all a typical low info internet lefty.
typical lefties are the reptiles who play fast and loose with the truth to further their agenda.
I deal in facts and argue from the facts.
however in this case - my hypothetical proved you were wrong.
if you would like to go over it again... I can.
I wonder how you can continue to be so stupid on this subject. Ricter gave up the fight quickly. He does that when he knows he was mistaken.
I don't get how stupid you are on this issue. I don't even understand how ignorant you are on this topic?
Are you really still trying to argue that having a stronger currency causes a negative trade imbalance. America had a very strong currency at times and had trade surpluses with it.
In the last few decades our dollar has devalued and we have a trade deficit. You think we can just devalue our way to a trade surplus? That is a really non systematic way to think and its ignorant of how the economy works.
It may lead to a few more exports but we will also be paying more for imports. In the short run devaluing could be a positive or a negative. It depends on how much and the quality of goods you exporting vs the ones you are importing and the elasticity of the demand for those goods.
But in the long run... Stronger economies making complex desirable goods like cars tractors, airplanes, medical tech and other tech is the way to trade surplus and a strong currency.
Last edited:
