Seriously, I would openly embrace the lukewarm centrist "one for all, all for one" brand if it was about making real compromise among the two political factions. But the truth of the matter, as far as I can tell, is that this is just a convenience used by the incompetent politicians to opportunistically score points. Unfortunately, Obama is no exception to this rule. Going back to the healthcare reform, Obama merely outlined what he wanted included in the bill and shifted the responsibility solely on the shoulders of Congress, thereby removing himself almost completely from the decision process. It's no wonder there's a stalemate.Quote from RangeBar:
So, if others with your values make that same decision we end up with another militaristic war-monger, anti-consumer, anti-worker, anti-environmentalist, anti-choice, religious Republican.
I guess if you are operating on the assumption that they will contribute to making things even worse and so bad that, like Bush, will cause Americans to flee back to the middle then that can make some sense.
For myself, I'll accept and support the middle-roader Obama and hope that in his 2nd term he will work to move us a even more closer to the middle. (Forget the rhetoric about moving to the LEFT: there is no left in American gov't.) In his first year of this term he has already changed the direction and tenor of the discussion on many issues.
It's this kind of lukewarm "let's wait and see" attitude that I and many liberals find worrisome to say the least. Be that as it may, I truly hope that he can deliver on his promises. I can tell you that Obama is a shrewd politician and he knows that he cannot abandon the liberal camp, for we are the only ones who will likely stay with him thick and thin. How he demonstrates himself in the coming months will prove crucial in my mind. I feel there will be a great commotion on the left if Obama continues to disregard the vow he has made with us.