Liberals Are Losing It After FBI Announces Hillary is Back Under Investigation
- Thread starter Tom B
- Start date
MSNBC's Brzezinski: Democrats Freaking Out Over Comey Shows He Might Be Onto Something With New Email Probe
Sen. Claire McCaskill was on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, where she said that FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress informing them that the bureau will review a trove of 650,000 emails recovered from Anthony Weiner’s laptop showed hubris, and that he should’ve kept his mouth shut until all the facts are analyzed. She did concede that there was cause to look into Clinton’s server over allegations that she might have mishandled classified information. In reality, we know why McCaskill and her Democratic colleagues are mad; it generates more bad press for Clinton. And that’s not Comey’s fault. It’s entirely on Clinton for setting up an unauthorized and unsecure email server that potentially put America’s national security at risk.
Democrats, your candidate sucks! All of this is the fault of Lady Macbeth. It’s not the FBI, it’s not the Russians—it’s her. The Left is frothing at the mouth with rage, using Comey as their personal punching bag, which Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski noted seems to confirm that there might be a bombshell development in these emails, adding that the reaction that Comey should’ve kept his mouth closed, that he went rogue, “The only thing that makes me think is that you’re actually reinforcing the premise that there’s something there,” she said.
“Because this is a man of great integrity, according to everybody who works for Hillary Clinton on down. He’s not partisan,” Brzezinski added. She also cited Comey’s role in stopping the Bush White House from reauthorizing the illegal domestic surveillance program, which required then Attorney General John Ashcroft, who was in the hospital, signing off on it. Comey intercepted White House Chief Of Staff Andrew Card and White House Counsel Alberto Gonzalez at the hospital (via WaPo, 5/17/07):
On the night of March 10, 2004, as Attorney General John D. Ashcroft lay ill in an intensive-care unit, his deputy, James B. Comey, received an urgent call.
White House Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales and President Bush's chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., were on their way to the hospital to persuade Ashcroft to reauthorize Bush's domestic surveillance program, which the Justice Department had just determined was illegal.
In vivid testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, Comey said he alerted FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III and raced, sirens blaring, to join Ashcroft in his hospital room, arriving minutes before Gonzales and Card. Ashcroft, summoning the strength to lift his head and speak, refused to sign the papers they had brought. Gonzales and Card, who had never acknowledged Comey's presence in the room, turned and left.
The sickbed visit was the start of a dramatic showdown between the White House and the Justice Department in early 2004 that, according to Comey, was resolved only when Bush overruled Gonzales and Card. But that was not before Ashcroft, Comey, Mueller and their aides prepared a mass resignation, Comey said. The domestic spying by the National Security Agency continued for several weeks without Justice approval, he said.
Oh yeah, Comey is such a partisan hack, right? The level of insanity and hypocrisybeing spewed from the Left over Comey’s Friday announcement that the FBI would review these emails is nothing short of appalling. After all, Democrats loved this guy last summer. Hillary Clinton put Comey in a horrible position. The FBI was always going to be part of this cycle ever since they launched a criminal probe into her email server. If he waited to inform the public, he would also be accused of playing politics, sitting on another batch of emails from a top Clinton aide.
The Clinton-related emails on Weiner’s laptop were from Huma Abedin, who shared the device. Weiner is under investigation for his online interactions with an underage girl; that’s how the emails were discovered. The FBI couldn’t review those emails without a new warrant since the Weiner investigation is separate. You think in today’s media, that information wouldn’t be leaked? He was going to be burned either way. As for Democrats, just deal with it. Both parties have awful candidates, but the GOP didn’t nominate someone under federal investigation.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...hows-that-he-might-be-onto-something-n2240164
Sen. Claire McCaskill was on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, where she said that FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress informing them that the bureau will review a trove of 650,000 emails recovered from Anthony Weiner’s laptop showed hubris, and that he should’ve kept his mouth shut until all the facts are analyzed. She did concede that there was cause to look into Clinton’s server over allegations that she might have mishandled classified information. In reality, we know why McCaskill and her Democratic colleagues are mad; it generates more bad press for Clinton. And that’s not Comey’s fault. It’s entirely on Clinton for setting up an unauthorized and unsecure email server that potentially put America’s national security at risk.
Democrats, your candidate sucks! All of this is the fault of Lady Macbeth. It’s not the FBI, it’s not the Russians—it’s her. The Left is frothing at the mouth with rage, using Comey as their personal punching bag, which Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski noted seems to confirm that there might be a bombshell development in these emails, adding that the reaction that Comey should’ve kept his mouth closed, that he went rogue, “The only thing that makes me think is that you’re actually reinforcing the premise that there’s something there,” she said.
“Because this is a man of great integrity, according to everybody who works for Hillary Clinton on down. He’s not partisan,” Brzezinski added. She also cited Comey’s role in stopping the Bush White House from reauthorizing the illegal domestic surveillance program, which required then Attorney General John Ashcroft, who was in the hospital, signing off on it. Comey intercepted White House Chief Of Staff Andrew Card and White House Counsel Alberto Gonzalez at the hospital (via WaPo, 5/17/07):
On the night of March 10, 2004, as Attorney General John D. Ashcroft lay ill in an intensive-care unit, his deputy, James B. Comey, received an urgent call.
White House Counsel Alberto R. Gonzales and President Bush's chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., were on their way to the hospital to persuade Ashcroft to reauthorize Bush's domestic surveillance program, which the Justice Department had just determined was illegal.
In vivid testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, Comey said he alerted FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III and raced, sirens blaring, to join Ashcroft in his hospital room, arriving minutes before Gonzales and Card. Ashcroft, summoning the strength to lift his head and speak, refused to sign the papers they had brought. Gonzales and Card, who had never acknowledged Comey's presence in the room, turned and left.
The sickbed visit was the start of a dramatic showdown between the White House and the Justice Department in early 2004 that, according to Comey, was resolved only when Bush overruled Gonzales and Card. But that was not before Ashcroft, Comey, Mueller and their aides prepared a mass resignation, Comey said. The domestic spying by the National Security Agency continued for several weeks without Justice approval, he said.
Oh yeah, Comey is such a partisan hack, right? The level of insanity and hypocrisybeing spewed from the Left over Comey’s Friday announcement that the FBI would review these emails is nothing short of appalling. After all, Democrats loved this guy last summer. Hillary Clinton put Comey in a horrible position. The FBI was always going to be part of this cycle ever since they launched a criminal probe into her email server. If he waited to inform the public, he would also be accused of playing politics, sitting on another batch of emails from a top Clinton aide.
The Clinton-related emails on Weiner’s laptop were from Huma Abedin, who shared the device. Weiner is under investigation for his online interactions with an underage girl; that’s how the emails were discovered. The FBI couldn’t review those emails without a new warrant since the Weiner investigation is separate. You think in today’s media, that information wouldn’t be leaked? He was going to be burned either way. As for Democrats, just deal with it. Both parties have awful candidates, but the GOP didn’t nominate someone under federal investigation.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...hows-that-he-might-be-onto-something-n2240164
IMAP: Four letters that spell potential doom for Hillary and Huma
I'll bet you're growing tired of the ongoing cancer that is the Hillary Clinton campaign of corruption, cover-ups and criminality.
Fear not. I've got something you may not have heard before. I hadn't heard of it until an hour or so ago. It's a technical acronym, related to Internet email, that most lay people wouldn't quite grok.
The inimitable Karl Denninger offers us the single, critical tidbit of data that makes all the difference. It relates to a statement that tech billionaire Mark Cuban made on CNBC:
This "newly discovered" laptop is very likely to be literal nuclear waste for Hillary and everyone around her, including the Clinton Foundation and all of Hillary's "advisers" such as Podesta.
Mark Cuban said that Huma used Outlook and IMAP (for Yahoo and similar). True.
But then he said this was unlikely to lead to "new" evidence in the form of the emails.
That's a lie.
It's a lie because Cuban knows he's full of crap; he knows enough about the technologies involved to be fully aware that he was peddling nonsense.
The term IMAP is key. It represents an Internet email protocol -- a messaging language -- that copies data from a server to a client. In English, IMAP would copy messages from Hillary Clinton's illegal, bathroom email server to a single PC running Outlook. Like the PC Huma shared with Carlos Danger Anthony Weinis Weiner.
And that means all messages on Hillary's server that were addressed to Huma Abedin may have been replicated to the Weiner machine.
Well, Doug, what does all of this mean? Consider the following:
The implications of IMAP on the Abedin-Hillary-Weiner-puter scandal cannot be overstated. It means, simply, that the hammer of Thor is about to come down on the Clinton RICO syndicate, whether before the election or after.
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2016/11/imap-four-letters-that-spell-potential.html#more
I'll bet you're growing tired of the ongoing cancer that is the Hillary Clinton campaign of corruption, cover-ups and criminality.
Fear not. I've got something you may not have heard before. I hadn't heard of it until an hour or so ago. It's a technical acronym, related to Internet email, that most lay people wouldn't quite grok.The inimitable Karl Denninger offers us the single, critical tidbit of data that makes all the difference. It relates to a statement that tech billionaire Mark Cuban made on CNBC:
This "newly discovered" laptop is very likely to be literal nuclear waste for Hillary and everyone around her, including the Clinton Foundation and all of Hillary's "advisers" such as Podesta.Mark Cuban said that Huma used Outlook and IMAP (for Yahoo and similar). True.
But then he said this was unlikely to lead to "new" evidence in the form of the emails.
That's a lie.
It's a lie because Cuban knows he's full of crap; he knows enough about the technologies involved to be fully aware that he was peddling nonsense.
The term IMAP is key. It represents an Internet email protocol -- a messaging language -- that copies data from a server to a client. In English, IMAP would copy messages from Hillary Clinton's illegal, bathroom email server to a single PC running Outlook. Like the PC Huma shared with Carlos Danger Anthony Weinis Weiner.
And that means all messages on Hillary's server that were addressed to Huma Abedin may have been replicated to the Weiner machine.
Well, Doug, what does all of this mean? Consider the following:
- It's likely that Huma Abedin committed perjury: Under oath, Hillary's key aide asserted that she had turned all over all emails related to her work with the Clinton State Department. Problem is, who else but Abedin would have bothered to configure Outlook to read Clinton's emails?
- Those 'deleted' 33,000 emails? Maybe not so much: Any email addressed to Abedin, whether "To:", "From:", "CC:", or "BCC:", would have been copied to Abedin's Weiner PC. Those 33,000 emails that Clinton attempted to delete with BleachBit, hammers, and magnets? They are very likely to have survived Hillary's purge.
- The Clinton Foundation's secrets exposed: The reason that Clinton nuked the infamous 33,000 emails almost certainly relate to the intersection of the Clinton Foundation, the State Department, and Teneo Corporation (that's the super, happy, fun "company" that ties all of the Clinton syndicates togather, RICO-style). Weiner Foundation, anyone?
- FBI Director James Comey's hand was forced: When faced with these revelations -- the replication of emails from the Clinton bathroom server to the Weiner-puter -- Comey realized he was in a major jam. Which led to the latest Hillary debacle.
The implications of IMAP on the Abedin-Hillary-Weiner-puter scandal cannot be overstated. It means, simply, that the hammer of Thor is about to come down on the Clinton RICO syndicate, whether before the election or after.
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2016/11/imap-four-letters-that-spell-potential.html#more