Liberals Are Losing It After FBI Announces Hillary is Back Under Investigation

[Tom B]

Liberals Are Losing It After FBI Announces Hillary is Back Under Investigation

Liberal supporters of Hillary Clinton are losing it after FBI Director James Comey announced Friday the criminal investigation into the former Secretary of State's mishandling of classified information has been reopened.

First, lets start with campaign chairman John Podesta:

“Already, we have seen characterizations that the FBI is 'reopening' an investigation but Comey's words do not match that characterization,” Podesta wrote in a statement. “Director Comey's letter refers to emails that have come to light in an unrelated case, but we have no idea what those emails are and the Director himself notes they may not even be significant.”
He also expressed frustration at the timing of the letter from Comey to lawmakers, informing them of the new evidence.
"It is extraordinary that we would see something like this just 11 days out from a presidential election,” he wrote, adding, “The Director owes it to the American people to immediately provide the full details of what he is now examining. We are confident this will not produce any conclusions different from the one the FBI reached in July."

Campaign manager Robby Mook has deleted his twitter feed.


New York Times columnist Paul Krugman:

Comey needs to provide full info immediately. Otherwise he has clearly made a partisan intervention, betraying his office.

— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 28, 2016
Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein:

Feinstein says Comey should have taken length of Clinton email probe into consideration before telling Congress

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) October 28, 2016
Feinstein: The FBI has a history of extreme caution near Election Day so as not to influence the results. Today’s break..is appalling

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) October 28, 2016
Feinstein says she "was shocked" to hear of FBI's move against Clinton. Says it's "troubling since so many questions are unanswered."

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) October 28, 2016
Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi:

PELOSI: FBI SHOULD PROVIDE FACTS, GOP STOKING INNUENDO: BBG

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) October 28, 2016
Vox's Matt Yglesias:

Fun fact: No Democrat has ever served as Director of the FBI.

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) October 28, 2016
Etc.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...-hillary-is-back-under-investigation-n2238122

 

[achilles28]

Two months ago Comey was a liberal hero who had an impeccable resume and made a totally unbiased decision not to indict.

Now, comey is thrown under the bus as a republican plant who somehow engineered a diabolical plan to destroy Hillary.

Liberals lie through their teeth to win. No morals

 

[futurecurrents]

Yawn.

Big yawn.

Uggg.

 

[Tom B]

NY Times Jittery Over Hillary’s Halloween Email Surprise, Krugman Cries Rigged Election
By Clay Waters | October 29, 2016 | 7:10 PM EDT

Just in time for Halloween, Hillary Clinton’s classified document scandal rose from the dead; FBI Director James Comey announced Friday that a newly discovered collection of emails “appear to be pertinent to the investigation.” Those emails were found while investigating a sexting scandal involving former Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner (former husband of top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin). And the New York Times is not happy.

Particularly aggrieved was columnist and Democratic hack Paul Krugman, who alleged that Comey was rigging the election (sound familiar?): “If we don't hear more from Comey, we just have to conclude that he was trying to swing election. And *that* should be the story.” That after weeks of the Times saying such talk was a threat to democracy.

In Saturday’s lead editorial, “Emails Again, Now With Mr. Weiner,” the Times, which had gotten cocky about Hillary’s electoral prospects, sounded a bit weary of the whole Democratic scandal thing.

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...ver-hillarys-halloween-email-surprise-krugman

 

[curiousGeorge8]

I am not liberal nor am a US citizen, but I found the fact that a secrete intelligence service (e.g. FBI) can have such a big impact on the presidential election very strange, to say the least.

 

[java]

I am not liberal nor am a US citizen, but I found the fact that a secrete intelligence service (e.g. FBI) can have such a big impact on the presidential election very strange, to say the least.

Hillary could have cleaned this up long before any election if she had complied with requests from the FBI to release her emails on her private server.

 

[Thor]

Hillary could have cleaned this up long before any election if she had complied with requests from the FBI to release her emails on her private server.

The only way she can do it, is if she has nothing to hide.
Comey is no fool, some follow up news is fothcoming to back up his position.

 

[Scataphagos]

Two months ago Comey was a liberal hero who had an impeccable resume and made a totally unbiased decision not to indict.

Now, comey is thrown under the bus as a republican plant who somehow engineered a diabolical plan to destroy Hillary.

Liberals lie through their teeth to win. No morals

The lie through their teeth after they win too. (Has there ever been a bigger liar than Obama?)

 

[fhl]

It's the Clinton/dem way. When they're running for office, they feel it should be kept secret from the voters if they are under FBI investigation.
So what if there was precedent for keeping investigations secret. Those secret investigations weren't of someone running for president.

When obama ran for senate, a judge unsealed divorce records so the voters could see his opponents skeletons. They claimed the voters had a right to know.
When voters want to see the real documents on Obama, we're told it all had to remain secret.

It's always a different story to democrats depending upon whether it's their own secret records or their opponents.

 

[CaptainObvious]

All she had to do was comply over a year ago and all this would be old news. Instead, they delayed, lied, did everything in their power to hide the facts and now they're mad it took so long. This is what happens when you have a corrupt political hack who operates in the shadows. Sometimes it takes awhile to shine the light and expose the cockroaches. Sorry it happened just a week before the election but once again, as always, the Clintons brought this on themselves.