Quote from TGregg:
9 pages, and nobody is really challenging the original premise.
Guess everbody knows it's spot on.
Quote from ..........:
While not perfect,Democrats are better for all minority groups then republicans are,the health care issue was just an example why.Democrats try to make health care accessible to them,Republicans like cantor and index piker tell them to get charity
Quote from trendlover:
"Republicans like cantor and index piker tell them to get charity"
then they say welfare keep people poor and down. Is contradiction.
Maybe the good tax deduction for wealthy people the charity, but is still welfare.
Quote from Mom0/pH0x:
yeah that makes sense. let's get a government who caters to the social and economic MINORITIES who contribute the least. that makes sense... don't you guys believe in DEMOCRACY? which means the MAJORITY RULES? sounds more and more like you guys prefer marxism or feudalism as opposed to democracy...
Quote from Mom0/pH0x:
are you that naive? those "messianic missions" are for control of resources and political capital, they have nothing to do with spreading democracy...
"underprivileged"? you have your head so far up your marxist ass that you don't see the implicit contradiction you just made. if it's a "privilege", by definition you are not entitled to it. hence, no one can be "underprivileged" because no one is entitled to any privileges. your logic is broken.