Liberal Media fails again.

32157_image%20%281%29.jpg
 
we don't have any direct evidence Tom Brady was aware of any deflating of balls

come on man, don't throw your brain out the window because it may hurt your party
 
we don't have any direct evidence Tom Brady was aware of any deflating of balls

come on man, don't throw your brain out the window because it may hurt your party
The purpose of this thread was to excoriate Stephanopolous because he donated $75,000 over 3 years to the Clinton Foundation. Sure, it would have been better for him to have disclosed. Was he wrong to ask the questions that he did? Would a responsible journalist just given the author a pass? Again, much ado about little. All this hoopla and mostly by the likes of Fox? So what was that about party?
 
Last edited:
The purpose of this thread was to excoriate Stephanopolous because he donated $75,000 over 3 years to the Clinton Foundation. Sure, it would have been better for him to have disclosed. But again, much ado about little. All this hoopla and mostly by the likes of Fox? So what was that about party?
I don't think there was ever any doubt he was a democrat, and that goes for just about every other political commentator. In college, all the republicans went to the business building, and all the democrats went to the political science building. Republicans ended up getting jobs, democrats ended up on tv.
 
and no, journalism is not a job, it's a profession, and just like all professions, doctor, lawyer, professor, you are not rated by how much money you make

now if you are a trader, that is a job, not a profession, because the only thing you are judged on is how much money you make

so, we hold people with jobs like traders to a much lower standard than we hold professionals like doctors, lawyers, professors and journalists
 
...so, we hold people with jobs like traders to a much lower standard than we hold professionals like doctors, lawyers, professors and journalists
Right. So despite his unfortunate misstep in not disclosing his being a donor, he, as a responsible journalist, held the author to account and did not accept allegations merely on the basis of innuendo by an author who had sought repeatedly in the past to discredit the Clintons.

Let's agree he should have disclosed. Let's also agree that he should have held the author to account. Meanwhile, guess what was the only thing that Fox and friends focused on.

Again, what was your earlier comment to me about party? (Hint: rhetorical question.)
 
Right. So despite his unfortunate misstep in not disclosing his being a donor, he, as a responsible journalist, held the author to account and did not accept allegations merely on the basis of innuendo by an author who had sought repeatedly in the past to discredit the Clintons.

Let's agree he should have disclosed. Let's also agree that he should have held the author to account. Meanwhile, guess what was the only thing that Fox and friends focused on.

Again, what was your earlier comment to me about party? (Hint: rhetorical question.)
can't believe you are taking a debate about Fox vs CNN vs msnbc vs ABC seriously. We should be asking more important questions like, "Do people still buy Gucci bags?"
 
and getting back to your brain, We all know Hillary is on the take, and didn't need a book to explain it, but the book explains it
 
Back
Top